Ignoring the little fish: an editorial in the Free Lance-Star

On a cold, blustery day in January, as bay advocates greeted one another in the General Assembly building in Richmond, I was reminded of the humanity sometimes lost in walking these halls and speaking with lawmakers about protecting our cherished Chesapeake Bay and its most important fish, the menhaden.

And for the third consecutive year a bill to fund a badly needed study of bay menhaden, as proposed by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, has failed. After hundreds of phone calls, visits, letters and petitions signed by 25,000 concerned citizens, how can this be?

The health of the bay and menhaden in particular should be of concern to all because these little baitfish are the base of the bay’s food chain and critical for a healthy ecosystem. Striped bass, once our most valuable fishery, are particularly sensitive to declines in menhaden. As usual, we are up against powerful lobbyists, big political donations and misinformation that clouds so many of today’s issues.

Concerns about overharvesting have grown with recent research that shows osprey chicks in the main stem of the Chesapeake Bay are starving due to lack of menhaden. Often viewed as the “canary in the coal mine,” osprey are yet another red flag, and this finding is consistent with the observations of many who note a decline in menhaden over recent years. Menhaden are a vital public resource yet the public has little say in how they are managed.

This is impacting the recreational fishing economy in Virginia — for example, fishing charters, bait shops, marinas and tourism — as well as important commercial crabbing and fishing. The American menhaden bait industry, which supplies crabbers and fishermen along the coast, is also impacted because the vast majority of the coastal quota goes to Canadian-owned Omega Protein, which grinds them up for animal feed.

In Virginia, the epicenter of the East Coast menhaden harvest, the bait industry gets only 10% of the quota while the foreign company gets 90%. And since Virginia is the only East Coast state that still allows this fishing, our near-shore waters get hammered all summer long. If you frequent the bay, you have no doubt witnessed those big blue industrial fishing machines wreaking havoc.

Thousands have asked our government officials: Why are we allowing a foreign company to practice industrial scale fishing in the bay, the most important estuary on the East Coast and nursery to many fish, like striped bass? They are taking up to 112 million pounds annually with no understanding of the impact on the bay’s fragile ecosystem. And when we raise these issues to the industry, they are quick to respond “there is no science to support your concerns.”

Fishery regulators are hesitant to act because of a “lack of science,” which the industry constantly touts. Yet, the industry lobbies against funding for a scientific study, despite being involved in the design of the study two years ago. To add insult to injury, the industry refuses to share their detailed catch data with scientists who could use it to estimate menhaden health in the bay.

Are we risking the health of the bay’s ecosystem and economy so that a Canadian company can make higher profits? By allowing the lower-cost harvesting in the bay versus the ocean, the state is subsidizing the industry with absolutely no understanding of the impact.

This “Canada first” policy must end. Move industrial menhaden fishing out of the bay until science can show it is not causing harm. Perhaps then they will become a responsible company and support needed science.

Steve Atkinson is president of the Virginia saltwater sportfishing association. contact him at steveatkinson52@verizon.net.

. . .

Comment: This editorial caught my eye because I remembered a heartbreaking story in the paper last summer. This are has a large Osprey population. I often see them catching fish in the Rappahanock around Fredericksburg. Last spring we saw a record number of Osprey hatchlings along the river. That was happily heralded in the paper, but late last fall, there was a disquieting story about a large number of those Osprey hatchlings starving to death. It was due to a lack of Menhaden in the Rappahannock.

I’m happy to post this editorial by Steve Atkinson. Maybe it’ll reach the right person or people. Given that Canada is the perpetrator here, maybe our governor should get word to the White House. They’re supposed to be buddies. I also have two senators and a representative to contact. They’re all Democrats, so they probably don’t have much pull right now. But my former representative is still there and he’s still a huge proponent of the Bay and its wildlife. And he’s the right political party. Time to compose some emails.

TTG 

This entry was posted in fauna, government, Local News, Nature, TTG. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Ignoring the little fish: an editorial in the Free Lance-Star

  1. leith says:

    They’re also in smaller estuaries up in New England. And their cousins, the Shad are also endangered. Someone imported them here to the west coast 150 years ago and they thrived here – or used to. I hope to catch a few this June. Great eating, but lots of bones. Best to smoke them, I use alderwood and a garlicky/onion/lemon/maple/bayleaf brine recipe I got from Hank Shaw’s website.
    https://honest-food.net/smoked-shad/

    • TTG says:

      leith,

      The shad run on the Rappahanock is a noted event every year now, especially since the dam just above Fredericksburg was removed years ago. The annual shad planking was a major Virginia political event years ago. It’s smaller now, but still held annually drawing Virginia politicians. We have a moratorium on American shad fishing, but hickory shad fishing is still allowed with limits. The Osprey look forward to the shad runs as much as the menhaden runs.

  2. leith says:

    We have American Shad here on the west coast. They fed George Washington’s Continental Army at Valley Forge. Wonder if that’s how they got their name? A guy by the name of Seth Green brought them cross country on the RR in milk cans. They get up the Bonneville Dam fish ladders better than the salmon that the ladders were built for originally. In WA there is no daily limit and no minimum size.
    https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/species/alosa-sapidissima#regs-seasons

    There is another close cousin of Menhaden further south that the North Carolina tidewater folk used to deep fry whole. Good eating. Can’t recollect the name. Alewife maybe, or something like it.

    • TTG says:

      leith,

      Are you thinking of smelts? Breaded and fried whole, they were always a favorite at the kids’ table at out traditional Christmas Eve dinner. Far more addictive than potato chips.

      • leith says:

        Could be.

        My kids used to grab lots of smelt off of the beach near Camp Pendleton during spawning season.

  3. LeaNder says:

    I am with you, concerning butterfly effects not enough worried about.

    A related US lawsuit, ultimately dismissed, not easy to challenge a CA$ 4 year enterprise, with or without creative business practises.

    Wiki: Cooke Inc
    Since its formation, Cooke Inc. has made approximately 100 acquisitions,[6] 14 of which, since 2016, being major acquisitions worth $2.5 billion. As of 2023, Cooke employs nearly 13,000 people, including 2,500 in Atlantic Canada. The company operates in 14 countries and utilizes 800 vessels along with 30 processing plants, while using their own hatcheries and feed plants. Cooke currently makes annual revenues of CA$4 billion.[3] Among the number of companies acquired by Cooke include Icicle Seafoods (2016), Omega Protein (2017),[7] and Tassal (2022).

    https://tinyurl.com/dismissed-lawsuit

    Strictly I wondered about the license, and when it was gained:
    Because the False Claims Act does not define property, Furman said the court must look to precedents.

    Furman cited a previous U.S. Supreme Court case in Louisiana in 2000 and another U.S. district court case in 2016 in Delaware that found that a fishing licence issued by a government does not constitute property.

    Furman then went on to cite previous court cases that found that fish do not count as property, therefore Cooke cannot be defrauding the government by harvesting menhaden.

    He cited a 1978 case that said “[a]s a general rule, wild fish, birds and animals are owned by no one. Property rights in them are obtained by reducing them to possession.”

    When reached by phone, Manthey and Benson’s lawyer, New York City-based Brendon DeMay, said they are reviewing their options and may consider an appeal.

  4. LeaNder says:

    oops, didn’t close one or the other quote tag at the right spot.

Comments are closed.