"…another of Mossad’s reason for being, as with all the world's spy services, is to make sure friends are really friends.
And judging by once sensitive FBI documents making the rounds in recent days, the Israelis have been at this task in Washington for a very long time.
The 21 documents, obtained by Grant F. Smith, a Washington, D.C. author who has made a career out of writing critical books on Israeli spying and lobbying, detail the FBI’s investigation into the theft of a confidential U.S. document on the Reagan administration’s position going into the 1984 U.S.-Israel Free Trade Area Negotiations.
Acting on a complaint that the document was circulating on Capitol Hill, the FBI discovered that an Israeli diplomat had acquired the paper and given it to officials at AIPAC, the lobbying group whose annual convention drew both Netanyahu and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton this week.
Although the document was classified only “confidential” (as opposed to Secret, Top Secret and higher), the FBI concluded that President Reagan’s “negotiating position concerning a trade agreement between the United States and the State of Israel is compromised because this report divulges those products and industries that have been identified by the International Trade Commission as being the most sensitive to imports from Israel."" Washpost
I suppose that this is news outside Washington and New York. pl
Is there good open source material on the “theft” of special nuclear materials from the US by Israel allowing production of weaponary?
I can’t put into words how much I appreciate the Rothko at your heading, naturally.
This is a very good, brief overview of the history of Israeli nukes: (By Steve Aftergood). http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/
It makes no mention of “stolen material” but this claim has been made many times. This (http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17104) has Victor Gallinsky, a former member of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission claiming that “1968 smuggling past Euratom inspectors of two hundred tons of uranium ore to Israel, the CIA’s conclusion at about the same time that Israel previously stole bomb-grade uranium from a US naval fuel plant, and the 1979 Vela satellite signal that was widely interpreted as an indication of an Israeli nuclear test.” I have no idea if this is true, or why Gillinsky would be in a position to know what the CIA had or had not determined. Should be easy to track down though.
Let me ditto the Rothko comment above.
first I have to ditto the Rothko comments. Actually I have been wondering if earlier paintings / images weren’t less easily recognizable Rothko’s too.
Interestingly the other two comments allude to nuclear science / material. I think that the atom bombs on Japan had a huge impact on the US artistic impression. And yes, Rothko is my absolute favorite among the Abstract Expressionist/New York School artists.
I once struggled with Barnett Newman or especially US art critique concerning Barney & the abstract sublime all the way back through Lyotard, Kant and Burke. But that would be a much longer story …
> “only confidential”
True, but CONFIDENTIAL is one of the three actual national security classifications that can get you thrown in jail for unauthorized disclosure to furriners.
> Vela satellite signal.
The wikipedia article on such is useful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_Incident . In particular, the item about Tyler Drumheller (full disclosure: I put it there) seems worth following up. It says,
Stephen Green has written extensively on this issue. A brief article on Neocons at:
A useful book by him:
The Vela Incident was well reported in the Journal”Science” , the magazine of the American Assn for the Advancement of Science in the news and comment section in several issues during 1979 and 1980. At least one of the articles was written by Gina Kolata who up until I lost track of her two years ago, was a science reporter for the New York Times.
A large flash of light was seen by satellites several hundred miles off the coast of South Africa 1979. The South Africans tried to pass it off as a large meteor crash but some radiation signatures were found. The consensus of the scientific community and the arms control community at that time, was that South Africa in conjunction with Israel tested a nuclear device.
When the ANC took over South Africa from the old apartheid government years later they publicly disposed of 7 or 8 nuclear weapons.
Thanks DanM, Allen Thomson, and R Whitman.
As to Victor Gallinsky the NRC has long been involved deeply with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) and Nunn-Lugar anti-proliferation issues. So I would judge Mr. Gallinsky as credible. Perhaps others would not.
> The Vela Incident was well reported in the Journal”Science” , the magazine of the American Assn for the Advancement of Science in the news and comment section in several issues during 1979 and 1980.
Thanks for pointing that out. I’m a member of AAAS and can get into their archives, which contain the following items on Vela. (The last Marshall item was on the same page as a Kolata article, which may be what you’re remembering.)
Flash Not Missed by Vela Still Veiled in Mist
Science 30 November 1979 206: 1051-1052
Scientists Fail to Solve Vela Mystery
Science 1 February 1980 207: 504-506
Navy Lab Concludes the Vela Saw a Bomb
Science 29 August 1980 209: 996-997
Science and Technology in the White House, 1977 to 1980: Part 2
Science 16 January 1981 211: 249-256