The "National Journal" has a number of "by invitation" blogs for supposed experts on various topics. This one deals with national security issues. I have been asked to comment there and will do so starting today. I will include links in SST to their day’s business as appropriate. pl
Donate
Browse by category
Recent Comments
- TTG on Mick Ryan on the coming Ukrainian offensive – TTG
- Billy Roche on Mick Ryan on the coming Ukrainian offensive – TTG
- Leith on Mick Ryan on the coming Ukrainian offensive – TTG
- Peter Williams on Mick Ryan on the coming Ukrainian offensive – TTG
- Fred on Mick Ryan on the coming Ukrainian offensive – TTG
Browse archives
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
RSS
- Open Thread – 30 March 2023
- Why We Fight* – TTG
- Mick Ryan on the coming Ukrainian offensive – TTG
- “It’s 7 a.m. in Tel Aviv after a night of protests. Here’s what you need to know about Israel’s political crisis” – TTG
- Russia to base nuclear warheads in Belarus… so what? – TTG
- “Drone strike kills US contractor in Syria; US retaliates” – TTG
- “Ukrainian troops impress US trainers as they rapidly get up to speed on Patriot missile system” – TTG
- “Russia hauls 1950s-era tanks out of storage to join battlefield” – TTG
- “Terran 1 | Good Luck, Have Fun” – TTG
- ISW take on the Xi – Putin meeting – TTG
Meta
Colonel,
I worry just how much ‘influence’ that Israel firsters/AIPAC stooges COS Emanuel and Senior Adviser Axelrod as ‘gatekeepers’ will have on Obama ordering a U.S. ‘assist’ to a dumber-n-dirt unwarranted/unnecessary Israeli first strike against Iran.
Israel govt. nutcases have been thumping their Iran war tinpans as hard as they can, hoping to ‘goad’ the U.S. into doing their ‘dirty work’ for them.
Col. Lang:
Glad to hear it. I’m pleased that your thinking will have a wider print audience.
I wonder to what extent this means that the vertical smokestacking that had been a notorious part of the communication process within the Bush administration is being taken down in anticipation of the incoming Obama administration’s interest in a more horizontal approach?
alnval
I suspect that the NJ did ths on their own. What I have seen so far of the comments there is not encouraging. Bloviation and pomposity reigns. pl
Colonel:
What I have seen so far of the comments there is not encouraging. Bloviation and pomposity reigns.
There are some nuggets of wisdom there, scattered among the long-winded collections of muddled metaphor and self-promotion. As in most arenas of thought, quality varies widely.
I did enoy your 11:19 am post. Brevity and authority are such a powerful combination.
‘Bloviation and pomposity reigns’
That seems a fair summary
This is the wrong model. Politico does it too– get a number of experts and recognizable names to comment on the question du jour, usually in a hundred words or less.
It’s like baseball cards for policy wonks! I even think you look cool in your shades!
(LOL good job taking them to task with “When manifesto and CV posting ends here…”) Don’t waste too much time there. Sic Semper Tyrannis is actually useful and needs your time and focus.
Otherwise, congratulations! I hope it’s a paid gig!
When Biden speculated that president-elect Obama would face a major international crisis within 6 months, most people — probably including the loquacious Biden himself — assumed such a crisis would involve a terrorist attack by jihadists. Maybe so. But evidence warrants at least a consideration of the possibility of a pre-emptive attack by Israel against Iran.
Such a desire appears to spring deep from within the Likud mindset and certainly not from those who follow the way of Buber. And the Jabotinsky-Likud intent has long manifested itself within the USG. During the Bush administration, it was the Wurmser-Cheney option. As other bloggers reported, evidence suggests that Wurmser and Cheney desired a limited strike against Iran, either by the US or, more likely, Israel. This limited strike would lead to increased attacks against US personnel in Iraq, resulting in a massive US strike against Iran. And then a clash of civilizations — Hagee’s greatest joy.
But if you follow that line of thinking to its logical conclusions, then you are left with the most unsettling questions. I just offer one. What about those US soldiers in Iraq who are suppose to maintain and preserve the supply routes from Kuwait to Baghdad?
One should continue to assume that this intent of a “limited strike still motivates some. No evidence suggests otherwise. To the contrary, all evidence supports this assumption.
So what exactly is meant by a limited strike? In my opinion, it would certainly behoove all the experts to review a particular US government document that arose during the Vietnam War era, titled “Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Southeast Asia”. It was declassified in approximately 2002 due to a FOIA request by the Nautilus Institute. Here is just one quote with a recommended link:
“The use of TNW in Southeast Asia is likely to result in greatly increased long-term risk of nuclear guerrilla operations in other parts of the world. U.S. security would be gravely endangered if the use of TNW by guerrilla forces should become widespread”.
http://tinyurl.com/56zajl
So once again, more evidence indicates a type of disconnect between certain policy makers and the those who rely on the US military experience, and at least some of its traditions, that wove its way through Vietnam War. So a life long civilian such as myself is left to ask, why have so many experts brushed aside the hard earned lessons learned from the Vietnam War? And while we are at it, why did a particular expert within the Pentagon call General Zinni a traitor back before Shock and Awe?
“Bloviation and pomposity reigns.”
“Invitation-only” blogs by design tend not to engender the fur-flying free-for-all that blogging has as its raison d’etre.
What I have heard from and about Rahm and Axlerod is so far reasonable. They are no Joe Lieberman or Colemans.
Great to see a little more attention being paid — but, at the risk of bastinado followed by defenestration or, worse, a Vesuvian riposte, esteemed Colonel, could you be (consciously?) reflecting Garry Trudeau’s Duke in your portrait/avatar?
Or was/is Duke echoing you??
“Duke ran for the White House after a short stretch as a key advisor to Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura. His campaign, headquartered in a motel in Coon Rapids, Minnesota, was a resounding failure, despite corporate sponsorships by heavy hitters Lipton Tea and Absolut Vodka. (Through the magic of motion capture technology, Duke was able to announce his candidacy in the real world on Larry King Live.) A successful business trafficking in stem cells was followed by a lucrative involvement in the messy fallout from the Enron scandal. As conflict with Iraq loomed, Duke made a return to government work, taking up a post as Viceroy-in-Waiting.
“During the U.S. occupation of Iraq, Duke installed himself as mayor of the (fictional) Iraqi city of Al Amok. In late September 2005, Duke escaped Iraq and relocated to New Orleans to profit from the reconstruction efforts after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. After years of verbal abuse and neglect – with the ‘final straw’ being that she was living in a lifeboat while Duke occupied a first-class suite – Honey finally left Duke. As Duke interviewed new candidates for the position of love-slave and aide-de-camp, none of whom lasted more than a few hours, Honey partied on a Mardi Gras float…
“Duke spent the period from late 2005 to late 2006 as a high-powered K Street lobbyist under the direction of his son Earl. He was not aware of the fact, since he was also comatose during that period (Earl conjectures this had something to do with losing Honey; Duke denies it). Earl used Duke’s knowledge of indigenous people to secure lucrative contracts with Native American tribes. Upon Duke’s awakening he and Earl must renegotiate the corridors of power under the new Democratic Congress. Recently there have been signs that Duke is having considerable success, finding a niche as a lobbyist for the repressive Middle Eastern regime of ‘Trff Bmklfrpzz, President-for-Life of Greater Berzerkistan,’ strategically located between Iran and Russia… He is currently trying to deal with the problem of the Berzerkistan Olympic Team defecting in the run-up to the games, recruiting a team of ringers from athletes who didn’t make the final cut for their own country’s team and swearing them in as citizens of Berzerkistan. It appears that he could be heading for success in this effort, as his longtime sidekick and aide Honey Huan has reappeared on the scene, working for the Credentials Department at the Olympics”.
Nuthin’ wrong with any of this and I’m sure the Langistas will club together for the cigarette holder (if we can’t tap into the Lipton/Absolut $$$).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Duke
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raoul_Duke
(And “From Coon Rapids to Al Amok” as a title has a certain je ne sais quoi…)
Anyway, if the NJ commentariat is infested with bloviation and pomposity, a gonzo response may be by far the best. Mean-spirited, surreal ridicule has its place.
I hope you and all your readers (which clearly includes your resident Middle East expert) have joyous and glorious Christmases/similar festivities/2009s.
Congratulations Sir. You’re in good company there.