Something to ponder the day after Christmas. pl
Donate
Browse by category
Recent Comments
- TTG on Senate’s MAHA caucus readies legislation as RFK Jr. is confirmed
- TTG on Senate’s MAHA caucus readies legislation as RFK Jr. is confirmed
- Mark Logan on Senate’s MAHA caucus readies legislation as RFK Jr. is confirmed
- Fred on Senate’s MAHA caucus readies legislation as RFK Jr. is confirmed
- Fred on Munich Security Conference in the shadow of Donald Trump
Browse archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
RSS
- Nope. There are no 150-year-olds on Social Security. It’s COBOL!
- Senate’s MAHA caucus readies legislation as RFK Jr. is confirmed
- Munich Security Conference in the shadow of Donald Trump
- Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth Renames Fort Liberty to Fort Bragg
- Worldwide count lets backyard birders ‘be part of a great big effort’
- Baltic grid divorce will further isolate Russian exclave in the EU
- Trump’s suggestion that US ‘take over’ the Gaza Strip is rejected by allies and adversaries alike
- “Trump says he will continue funding Ukraine’s war effort — but he wants something rare in return”
- In NASA asteroid samples, scientists discover key building blocks of life
- Thoughts on the Potomac Air Crash
Meta
You’ll know we’re actually making progress when they stop blurring out the faces of Iraqi soldiers and police in those publications.
Happy Xmas PL.
I clicked on the new Polish AVC, bottom left. I would love to know what they cost.
“Korea and Kosovo”: Mr. Secretary, didn’t you leave something out? My imagination, I suspose.
Nguoi thich Hoa Binh
My quick reaction: What a complete load of bullsh*t.
ddasher: I second your motion. You know, locals enlist in every colonial army.
I do not have the discipline to read more than a few lines of this…er, solution. However I may use it to wash my pet hog, Bud. Bud is short for Budget Porcinus, of course.
This publication is in keeping with an earlier observation that our Southeast Asia involvement changed fundamentally when the first of thousands of air conditioners were off-loaded and installed in one of our many bases. A savvy USMC general officer opined at the time that all US forces committed to SEA after 1965 should be required to live in tents and eat field rations. Had that been the norm, he argued, the propensity to homestead would have been nonexistent. When that initial Frigidaire was mounted in a Tan Son Nhut window and the 50 kw fired up, staff folks got comfortable and the signal was given that we were there to stay. This slick English language-only, civil affairs pub with polished text and complimentary professional grade photos causes me to pause and reinforces my concern that this ill-initiated misadventure ain’t seen as a ‘git in and git out’ operation within the military. The air conditioners are there in strength.
My interest, if I sustain it, is why Gates has gone to Iraq to get first-hand reports, and from whom? What was the chain of command (and evidence, to a Historian) from Gates’s decision, or execution of orders, to his being told “Things are really swell.” all over the Green Zone?
I think it sounds like a cover story, but I’ve mostly dealt with students, and not other brazen BS artistes, lately.
I base the below on this thread and an article in today’s Washington Post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/27/AR2006122701839_2.html
On 20 December 2006 a large ceremony is held to declare Nijaf is under “Iraqi Provincial Control”. The handover agreement, according to Sadiq al-Rikabi, a political adviser to Maliki, is that the “Iraqi side” is to be informed of all actions taken by “multinational forces”. I take that to mean Maliki was promised the US would keep him informed of our plans in Nijaf and allow him to veto actions.
One week later, on 27 December 2006, one of Sadr’s aides is shot and killed in an early morning raid on his home in Nijaf. The raiding force had 8 American advisers and 35 Iraqi soldiers. That’s almost 1 American for every 4 Iraqis. How much advice do they need?
But in spite of “Iraqi provincial control”, and although the US spokesperson claims the raid was Iraqi planned and executed, Maliki claims he had no previous knowledge of the raid.
Maliki openly demanded an explanation, but was stonewalled by the US. Maliki has set up a committee to investigate the incident, and some of Maliki’s own aides openly wonder if the raid was an execution ordered by the Americans.
The US spokesperson would only say the target of the raid had been under investigation for a “long time” and was implicated in a bombing. I doubt any evidence will ever be presented for review, for “security reasons”.
So what does this tell us? Here’s my conclusions:
1. Maliki and his government is not trusted or respected by our forces. They keep secrets from him, break promises to him, and carry out lethal actions in areas officially under his government’s control, without much worry.
2. Our forces command a select number of Iraqi soldiers outside the Iraqi chain-of-command. They can get these soldiers to keep secrets from, and execute missions contrary to, their own government.
3. The use of warrantless surprise home-invasions of suspects by heavily armed soldiers with little or no police training, no matter how good their previous secret investigation, will eventually lead to shootouts that cause many reasonable people to question their motives. This particular raid has the Iraqi government openly suspecting the US military of political assassination. It might have been better to simply order the suspect in for questioning. Sure, he probably would have fled, but then at least the claim could be made he was not the target of assassination.
4. In light of 1, 2, and 3 above, it’s going to be impossible to convince any sane, logical person in Iraq that they can trust their own government or the US forces more than their own militias, and yet that trust is absolutely essential for our stated goals of peace and security in Iraq.
What tequila said… (q.v.’Adviser’, p.5). On that page they also said the handover of Najaf to Iraqi control was performed at a ceremony attended by “a crowd of hundreds”…
Anyway, belatedly a v. happy Christmas and New Year’s to you, Colonel!
Folks
Ralph Peters is a joke. Not to worry about his fantasies. pl
Here’s a new article, in which unnamed Iraqi government officials talk of an Iraqi unit that report directly to the Americans.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070206/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
So, as I noticed back in December, it appears the US maintains its own Iraqi militia that operates without the knowledge or consent of the Iraqi government.
So Bush tells us militia’s are bad, but maintains one himself. This militia supports the “Iraqi government” by defying its policies in areas that are “Iraqi controlled”.
This sounds like the type of Iraqi unit that performed the raid on Sadr’s aide back in December.
This kind of unit is perfect for dirty-work, as the Americans and Iraqi government can both deny responsibility for its actions.
I firmly believe that these kind of units are nearly always over-used and end up doing more harm than good. They invite all kinds of corrupt behavior, undermine trust in government, etc.