When It Comes to Iran, Trump & Company Ignore Facts by Publius Tacitus

Hits: 0

Tacitus01

If you placed your hopes that a President Donald Trump would bring some sanity back to U.S. foreign policy, especially with respect to U.S./Iran relations, you made a mistake. Trump’s Administration, using the voice of his Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, is beating the drum denouncing Iran as the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the World.

The chutzpah award on this point goes to Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister, Adel al-Jubeir, who declared in October 2015:

. . .that Iran “is the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world, and it is working on destabilizing the region. If it wants to build good relations with its neighbors, it ought to deal with them based on the good neighborliness principle and not to interfere in their affairs. We [would] welcome such a step.”

(Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2015/10/saudi-arabia-yemen-syria-crisis-relations-disputes-agreement.html#ixzz3yMmotxLV)

The Saudi Foreign Minister conveniently ignored the fact that 15 of the 19 terrorists who hijacked planes and attacked America on 11 September 2001 were Saudis not Iranians.

Iran is no innocent on the issue of terrorism. The Revolutionary Guard and their agents, following the ordres of the Mullahs, were responsbile for the deaths of thousands from hundreds of terrorist attacks since the early 1980s.

When Iran fell under the rule of the Ayatollah, it routinely relied on terrorism—bombings, hijackings and kidnapping—to pursue its goals. They were directly involved in the taking of U.S. hostages in Lebanon and the bombings of the US Embassy in Beirut and the Marine barracks. But Iran’s actions were not just blind hatred. There was a strategic context to Tehran’s use of terrorism. Iran was at war with Iraq, which had the full support of the United States and other western countries. For Iran terrorism was a way to punch back against a more powerful military foe. The pragmatism on the part of Iran was further evidenced by the fact that it had a secret arrangement with Israel in acquiring weapons to use against Iraq.


But it is wrong to insist that Iran continues to be the major force driving the terrorist violence seen in the Middle East, Europe, Africa and America. In contrast to the period 1982 thru 1989, which was the high water mark of Iran reliance on terrorism as a key component of its foreign policy, Iran has shifted towards more conventional political and military methods for achieving its national goals.

The terrorism that marked Iran twenty years ago is no longer its calling card. The role of chief terrorist has been taken over by a legion of radical Sunni groups. Starting with the Al Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington, DC in September of 2001, the identity of the terrorist attacks has shifted dramatically, with the vast majority of the violence attributable to radical Sunni Islamists. According to the latest edition of the Global Terrorism Index (http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Global-Terrorism-Index-2016.2.pdf) , a publication of the Institute for Economics and Peace, four groups accounted for 74% of all fatalities from terrorism in 2015—Boko Haram, Al-Qaida, the Taliban and ISIS.

Consider the list of Muslim Groups presently actively hostile to the US:

– The Islamic State (Sunni)

– The Al-Nusra Front (Sunni)

– Al-Qa'ida Central (Sunni)

– Al-Qa'ida in Magheb (Sunni)

– Al-Qa'ida in Arabian Peninsula (Sunni)

– Boku Haram (Sunni)

– Al-Shabbab (Sunni)

– Khorassan Group (Sunni)

– Society of the Muslim Brothers (Sunni)

– Sayyaf Group in the Philippines (Sunni)

– Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan (Sunni)

– Lashgar i Taiba (Sunni)

– Jemaa Islamiya (Sunni)

– Houthis (Shia)

Of the 14 groups, only the Houthis are tied to Iran.

The last significant terrorist attack that is believed to have been carried out with Iran’s support was the July 2012 bombing of the bus hauling Israeli tourists in Bulgaria. But that was not just gratuitous violence to kill Jews for the sake of killing Jews. It was classic retaliation for what Iran perceived as Israel’s backing of a terrorist campaign in Iran.

The attack on the bus followed an 18-month series of attacks in Iran resulting in the murder of engineers and scientists believed to be involved with Iran’s Nuclear program. Iran blamed Israel (and to a lesser degree the United States) for the following murders:

January 12, 2010 Masoud Alimohammadi Iranian Physicist

KILLED IN A CAR BOMB. MAJID JAMALI FASHI REPORTEDLY CONFESSED TO AN IRANIAN COURT HE HAD BEEN RECRUITED BY MOSSAD TO CARRY OUT THE EXECUTION

November 29, 2010 Majid Shahriari Iranian nuclear scientist

KILLED IN A CAR BOMB. ACCORDING TO THE GERMAN NEWSPAPER DER SPIEGEL ISRAEL WAS BEHIND THE KILLING.[223]

November 29, 2010 Attempted killing of Fereydoon Abbasi. Iranian nuclear scientist

WOUNDED IN A CAR BOMB.[224][225]

July 23, 2011 Darioush Rezaeinejad Iranian electrical engineer

KILLED BY UNKNOWN GUNMEN ON MOTORCYCLE. REZAEINEJAD WAS INVOLVED IN DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-VOLTAGE SWITCHES, WHICH ARE USED IN A KEY COMPONENT OF NUCLEAR WARHEADS. SUCH SWITCHES MAY ALSO HAVE CIVILIAN SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS.[230] THE GERMAN NEWSPAPER DER SPIEGEL CLAIMED MOSSAD WAS BEHIND THE OPERATION. HE IS THE THIRD IRANIAN NUCLEAR SCIENTIST KILLED SINCE 2010.[231]

November 12, 2011 Major General Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam

THE MAIN ARCHITECT OF THE IRANIAN MISSILE SYSTEM AND THE FOUNDER/FATHER OF IRAN’S DETERRENT POWER BALLISTIC MISSILE FORCES. HE WAS ALSO THE CHIEF OF THE “SELF-SUFFICIENCY” UNIT OF THE ARMY OF THE GUARDIANS OF THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION KILLED ALONG WITH 17 OTHER MEMBERS OF THE REVOLUTIONARY GUARDS KNOWN AS BID KANEH EXPLOSION. THOSE WHO DIED ARE KNOWN AS THE “SHAHIDAN GHADIR”.

IRANIAN OFFI CIALS SAID THAT THE BLAST AT THE MISSILE BASE WAS AN ACCIDENT, AND RULED OUT ANY SABOTAGE ORGANIZED BY ISRAEL. AGIR SAID THAT THE EXPLOSION “HAD TAKEN PLACE IN AN ARMS DEPOT WHEN A NEW KIND OF MUNITIONS WERE BEING TESTED AND MOVED”. HOWEVER, TIME MAGAZINE CITED A “UNNAMED WESTERN INTELLIGENCE SOURCE” AS SAYING THAT MOSSAD WAS BEHIND THE BLAST. ISRAEL NEITHER CONFIRMED NOR DENIED ITS INVOLVEMENT.[233] [234] [235]

January 11, 2012 Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan Iranian nuclear scientist

THE BOMB THAT KILLED AHMADI-ROSHAN AT THE NATANZ URANIUM ENRICHMENT FACILITY, AND ANOTHER UNIDENTIFIED PERSON WAS A MAGNETIC ONE AND THE SAME AS THE ONES PREVIOUSLY USED FOR THE ASSASSINATION OF THE SCIENTISTS, AND THE “…WORK OF THE ZIONISTS [ISRAELIS],” DEPUTY TEHRAN GOVERNOR SAFARALI BARATLOO SAID.[236] [237][238]

One can easily imagine the outrage and demands for revenge that would sweep America if we believed that Iran was sending operatives into the United States to murder engineers and scientists working on projects, such as drones.

But these facts do not matter. The popular and persistent meme in the US media is that Iran is an unrepentant terrorist state. Iran, if you listen to the pundits, is using its special operations military forces to train and equip terrorists. But in an ironic twist, it is the United States that is implicated in attacks against Iran.

Author Sean Naylor, Relentless Strike, which details the history of operations and missions carried out by U.S. Joint Special Operations Command aka JSOC over the last 30 years, sheds light on an uncomfortable truth regarding our support to terrorists. To quote an old cartoon, “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

“JSOC personnel also worked with the Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), a militant Iranian exile group that had based itself in Iraq after falling afoul of the ayatollahs’ regime in Tehran. The State Department had placed the MEK on its list of designated terrorist organizations, but that didn’t stop JSOC from taking an attitude of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” toward the group. “They were a group of folks that could transit the border, and they were willing to help us out on what we wanted to do with Iran,” said a special operations officer.”

The MEK were classified as a terrorist group until the United States decided that as long as the MEK would help kill Iranians rather than Americans that they were no longer terrorists. The MEK’s history of terrorism is quite clear:

  • During the 1970s, the MEK killed U.S. military personnel and U.S. civilians working on defense projects in Tehran and supported the takeover in 1979 of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.
  • In 1981, the MEK detonated bombs in the head office of the Islamic Republic Party and the Premier’s office, killing some 70 high-ranking Iranian officials, including Chief Justice Ayatollah Mohammad Beheshti, President Mohammad-Ali Rajaei, and Premier Mohammad-Javad Bahonar.
  • Near the end of the 1980-1988 war with Iran, Baghdad armed the MEK with military equipment and sent it into action against Iranian forces.
  • In 1991, the MEK reportedly assisted the Government of Iraq in suppressing the Shia uprisings in southern Iraq and the Kurdish uprisings in the north.
  • In April 1992, the MEK conducted near-simultaneous attacks on Iranian embassies and installations in 13 countries, demonstrating the group’s ability to mount large-scale operations overseas.
  • In April 1999, the MEK targeted key military officers and assassinated the deputy chief of the Iranian Armed Forces General Staff.
  • In April 2000, the MEK attempted to assassinate the commander of the Nasr Headquarters, Tehran’s interagency board responsible for coordinating policies on Iraq.
  • The normal pace of anti-Iranian operations increased during “Operation Great Bahman” in February 2000, when the group launched a dozen attacks against Iran. One of those attacks included a mortar attack against the leadership complex in Tehran that housed the offices of the Supreme Leader and the President.
  • In 2000 and 2001, the MEK was involved regularly in mortar attacks and hit-and-run raids on Iranian military and law enforcement units and government buildings near the Iran-Iraq border, although MEK terrorism in Iran declined toward the end of 2001.

Prominent U.S. political and military leaders from both parties have been quite willing to excuse the terrorism of the MEK

In 2011, several former senior U.S. officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, three former chairmen of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, two former directors of the CIA, former commander of NATO Wesley Clark, two former U.S. Ambassadors to the United Nations, the former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, a former White House Chief of Staff, a former commander of the United States Marine Corps, former U.S. National Security Advisor Frances Townsend, and U.S. President Barack Obama‘s retired National Security Adviser General James L. Jones called for the MEK to be removed from its official State Department foreign terrorist listing on the grounds that they constituted a viable opposition to the Iranian government.

As long as a group of terrorists will back the U.S. cause then we have seen the willingness of politicians to ignore their terrorist past. With respect to the MEK it was Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama that ultimately gave the group with a record of killing Americans a pass.

The U.S. Iranian relationship is best described as that of couple trying to find common ground after a bitter divorce. The fall of the Shah in 1979 caused a rancorous, deadly split between Washington and Tehran, with each partner believing they had been betrayed and humilitated by the other.

Within Iran and the United States there are prominent people and groups who readily recite the litany of wrongs they have endured from the other to justify feelings of hatred and disgust. Yet, the focus should be on who is doing what now. It is on that point with respect to the issue of terrorism that Americans must acknowledge that the Iran of 2017 is not the Iran 0f 1986. The vast majority of terrorism that is shaking the world today is conceived and nutured by radical Sunnis bent on destroying Iran. That is a fact that is largely ignored in the United States.

 

 

This entry was posted in As The Borg Turns, Iran, Korea. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to When It Comes to Iran, Trump & Company Ignore Facts by Publius Tacitus

  1. Medicine Man says:

    Thank you for this post, Publius Tacitus. With double standards being the coin of geopolitics, articles like this are very useful for maintaining perspective.

  2. doug says:

    It wouldn’t surprise me at all that if Americans were polled about the 9/11 terrorists’ backgrounds, most would today say they were from Iran. Just as they once believed Iraq was responsible. It’s not so much that people are stupid but most citizens are busy enough dealing with day to day issues and they just hear or read snippets.
    The art of selling is framing the narrative, not communicating droll facts. Much as Colin Powell did at AIPAC in early 2003. He slammed Iraq as the largest state sponsor of international terrorism. It meant one thing to the AIPAC crowd which was aware that Iraq paid out money to Palestinian families of suicide bombers. From the average Israeli (and AIPAC activist) POV, that was emotionally compelling, if not accurate description. To the larger audience of Americans not so ME aware, it was just re-enforcement that Iraq was the big bad and supported the notion of Iraqi involvement in 9/11.
    It worked then why not now? And with the Gulfies leading the effort it’s a powerful pitch. Now that the Trump administration has been assimilated, what could possibly go wrong?

  3. different clue says:

    doug,
    Its a version of the garbage in- garbage out principle. A very good computer with a very good program will give bad answers if given bad data.
    And of course the human neuro-bio-brain is not a computer. It is way more complex. The more it is given a certain set of “fakks and thawts” to think about, the more its neuro-plastic neurons will grow tendrils and connections to think and handle those “fakks and thawts” more easily. If you then try giving it a different set of “fakks and thawts”, the cerebro-neuro networks formed around the prior fakks and thawts will resist and reject the different fakks and thawts.
    So it would take years of offering people a coherent set of counterfakks and counterthawts for those people to even begin to regrow their cerebro-neural networks to accomodate the counterfakks and counterthawts. And that’s just the people who already susPECT that something is wrong with the fakks and thawts they are currently running and actively seek to try finding a different set of fakks and thawts.
    Now HOPEfully SOMEone is dealing in actual facts and thoughts. I think that SST is dealing in actual facts and thoughts. Certainly the SST people have made a lot of accurate predictions and forecasts about what will happen when and where. That indicates a robustly predictive theoretical framework running on SST.
    So hopefully the readership here can keep spreading SST to people who suspect something is wrong with the fakks and thawts they are given by the MSM and are already looking for something better. Spreading it both individually to real analog persons in meatspace and digitally to reader-avatars in cyberspace. It will require years of patient effort. Many of the people who voted against Clinton and the Brand Name Republicans have shown that they are already looking for a means of escape from the MSM brain-cage.
    (Interesting observation: spellcheck red-flags “meatspace” but does not red-flag “cyberspace”. So cyberspace is a real word so far as spellcheck is concerned.)

  4. It would be of interest to figure out who or whom in the U.S. government determines what groups will be supported or utilized by U.S. diplomacy or military assistance.

  5. Cee says:

    PT,
    Great piece. I’ve been complaining about MEK for years.
    Korea and Iran ate mentioned in Crosstalk
    https://youtu.be/j-gjDtQ8OeY

  6. Kooshy says:

    PT,
    Thank you for your post, it is refreshing and interesting, regarding Iran and US’ ongoing 50 plus year of struggle, and Iran and UK’ 150 years of
    struggle, which usually starts with Iran being blamed for past terrorism (in which means they started this struggle), there are a few points that needs to be considered before anybody can accuse Iran of state sponsored terrorism. Is well know and documented that Iran and US are in a strategic asymmetrical war of attrition( meaning US wishes Iran gets a regime change, and Iran whishes US will have a mind change) , ever since the Iranian revolution. Is well known that the venue, the start timing and type of this war was not chosen or picked by Iran, it all was decided and chosen by US, is a US war of choice ( necessity?) imposed on Iran, to stop, delay, defeat independent Iran’s insubordination to US’ dictates. This is not unusual for superpowers (you read empires) through out history, they all hated insubordination, independent acting states, US is no different there. I don’t wholly blame this US’ posture on demands of Israel and KSA, and others, this is partly normal hegemonic empire stuff, like what Victoria Nulands of world think brings endurance to thier values.
    So if we can establish US has started, an is in an ongoing asymmetrical, strategic, proxy war against Iran and her resistance allies ever since Iranian revolution, then we can not blame the two sides for taking thier agents, operatives hostage, killing each other’s soldiers, agents, and assets. Certainly US has, and is, justifying doing all that all around the world, in fight against terrorism, why can’t Iranians? IMO, A coup against legitimate goverment is no different than other form of terrorism. IMO, from what I have learned on Iranian history, behavior and national values, I don’t see Iranian will fold raise a flag and let the west take over, they have no choice but to resist. Like the nuclear deal this is all US’ call. President Trump ( and generally all other administrations since the revolution) think this is like a business negotiation, deal making, if you bully the vendor and can’t make a deal with one vendor, you can always go and deal with a different vendor. Thank you

  7. Tigermoth says:

    With regards to the Middle East, I have come to the conclusion they are determined by whether they advance the “Oded Yinon” plan of breaking up any entity that could be a problem for Israel.
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815
    This is becoming less covert than in the past, as indicated by US Defense Secretary wearing a lapel pin with both the American and Israeli flags “crossed” during his press conference in Israel.
    https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/us-led-coalition-methodically-remove-defense-secretary/

  8. Valissa says:

    Great comment Koshy, thanks!

  9. Jill says:

    Regarding the crossed flags lapel pin… is this usual? When visiting the UK, France, etc., would such a lapel pin be worn? I find it a little surprising but that could be my ignorance.

  10. ex-PFC Chuck says:

    Per Tigermoth: “This is becoming less covert than in the past, as indicated by US Defense Secretary wearing a lapel pin with both the American and Israeli flags “crossed” during his press conference in Israel.”
    WTF?

Comments are closed.