Senior Iran cleric hails “Islamic state of Iraq” Fri. 26 Aug 2005 |
Tehran, Iran, Aug. 26 – A senior Iranian cleric welcomed on Friday the establishment of an Islamic republic in Iraq and hailed the country’s new constitution as one based on “Islamic precepts”. Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, who heads the powerful ultra-conservative Guardian Council, told worshippers in Tehran’s Friday prayers, “Fortunately, after years of effort and expectations in Iraq, an Islamic state has come to power and the constitution has been established on the basis of Islamic precepts”. “We must congratulate the Iraqi people and authorities for this victory”, he said. Jannati, who is a top confidant of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said that all justice-seeking counties of the world “have no model other than the Islamic revolution in Iran to turn to”. “Lebanese Hezbollah and the state of Iraq are not the only supporters of the Islamic revolution”, he said. Referring to the West as Global Arrogance, the hard-line cleric said, “No matter how many stones they throw in our path, they cannot prevent the spread of the Islamic revolution in the world”. “We are the winners in the nuclear issue, too”, Jannati said. “The way is paved for our progress and we just need to work hard”. Jannati said the rising oil prices had placed Iran on a sound financial footing. “We still have problems, but less than before”. In comments directed against other factions within the clerical regime, Jannati called on the new hard-line government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to “purge executives who have been within our system, but who have been opposing our system and abusing people’s rights”. “These executives must be purged as soon as possible”, the powerful cleric said. http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3494 There has been contiinuing debate as to whether or not Iran has played a purposeful and cunning role in luring us into our present predicament. This ought to have some effect on that discussion. Before the Iranian "election" (in which Jannati and his colleagues chose the candidates), we were assured by the members of the Wolfowitzian school of Neo-Orientalist Jacobin political philosophy that Iran was a country "on the cusp" of a pro-Western revolution against Jannati and his associates. We were assured by various scholars at AEI and analysts at the major media that YOUTH stood ready to cast down the Mullahs so that YOUTH could emerge into the sunny highlands of modernity. Jannati seems unaware of his recent defeat. Jannati is pleased with the progress of our de facto program of de-secularization in the ME. Pat Lang
|
Donate
Browse by category
Recent Comments
- John on Trump tells Putin: end war in Ukraine or face huge sanctions
- leith on Open Thread – Inauguration Day 2025
- Fred on Open Thread – Inauguration Day 2025
- Fred on Open Thread – Inauguration Day 2025
- James on On December 19, 2024 Congress tried to suspend the federal debt limit until 2027 but the vote failed. The January 2 limit is full. What now?
Browse archives
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
RSS
Meta
Colonel, it’s interesting (although painful) to see the neocon’s ignorance pave the way for Tehran’s hardliners. I wonder if you have an opinion on Iran’s strategy (nuclear and in support of the Iraqi insurgency) in light of the fact of US troops surrounding Iran in Afghanistan and Iraq.
I don’t mean to support their nuclear program; I am curious, however, if you think the Iranians are worried about US military hegemony or intent on their own military expansion.
Is their intention defense or offense?
wtofd
Our 20000 men in Afghanistan and 130000 in Iraq are no threat to them. They are fully occupied. Air bases in Central Asia are more serious but a bombing campaign by us would not be dependent on those, just made easier.
Listen to Jannati. There is nothing defensive about that. they have been having fun with us and are sure they are winning.
Iraq? Political action through their allies and their militias followed by Iranian forces when and if the time is ripe and they are necessary.
They don’t need to anyhting right now with their own forces. We are doing it for them. pl
WTOFD
The Iranians have been the major state sponsors of Islamic terrorism, both Sunni and Shia since 1979.
People working for them were the hostage takers in Lebanon (Higgins, etc) The Iranians were also behind the Al-Khobar bombings in SA. Was that defensive also? pl
Colonel, thank you. I understand the dar-al-Islam aspirations of Tehran. I also understand what their biggest export is after oil.
I should have been more precise: do you think their nuclear program is offensive or defensive?
wtofd
This is a question of intention not capability. It can be one thing one day and the other the next. pl
Col. Lang, do you have a sense of how the ME govts and civilians understand the neocon mismanagement of this war?
In other words, do the Kuwaitis, Egyptians, Saudis understand the divide between the chicken hawks and the hawks? The faith based and the reality based? T.S.
wtofd,
The ME govenments attribute the whole thing to a desire to “steal” their oil in the context of a dominant pro-Israeli influence in the US policy for the region. pl