Supreme Court Justice Roberts Did Not Fly on Pedophile Plane

Lin Wood goes nuclear on justices: 'Chief Justice John ...

Jonathan McGreevy (a convicted felon who claims without proof he holds advanced degrees) who also has used the name Ryan Dark White and the Twitter tag–JohnHereToHelp, is a certified fraud (you can read the evidence supporting my statement here and here). And Attorney Lin Wood and former Trump Administration employee Garrett Ziegler have foolishly and stupidly relied on his groundless assertions that Supreme Court Justice Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein hung out.

Here’s the bottomline–the allegation that Supreme Court Justice Roberts had a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and flew on his plane at least twice is false. It is a lie. Not true.

Here is the evidence. Garret Ziegler and Lin Wood have posted a pdf document about Supreme Court Justice John Roberts and list two flights from Jeffrey Epstein’s flight log that show someone by the name of “John Roberts” traveling the following ititnerary:

22 March 2010  “John Roberts” travels from Palm Beach to Oakland, Michigan

10 February 2011 “John Roberts” travels from Palm Beach to Teterboro Airport in New Jersey.

The published document presents a series of “facts” as if they all pertain to Supreme Court Justice John Roberts. But “John Roberts”, like Larry Johnson, is a common name. Here is an easy want to show that the John Roberts on the Epstein log is not the Supreme Court Justice.

On March 22, 2010, the Supreme Court was in session hearing “Arguments.” It is impossible for John Roberts to be on a plane flying from West Palm, Flordia to Oakland, Michigan (it is at least a five hour flight depending on headwinds) while sitting in his chair at the Supreme Court hearing legal arguments.

This entry was posted in Larry Johnson. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Supreme Court Justice Roberts Did Not Fly on Pedophile Plane

  1. Teddy says:

    Woods likes to surround himself with QAnon grifters which explains his bizarre rants & smears.

  2. Babeltuap says:

    Roberts did shame the Constitution with the ACA which was absolutely illegal. If his name gets drug through the mud right or wrong he deserved it because he earned it. It’s not the job of the Federal Government to provide healthcare along with about 90% of the other services like PBS, NPR, Planned Parenthood, WIC welfare and god knows what else. All those programs destroy the fabric of freedom and create a society of defeatism, nepotism and human depravity.

  3. Razumov says:

    Lin Wood has previously claimed (without evidence) that John Roberts was involved in child trafficking with Epstein:

    He has also suggested that Roberts was involved in murdering Scalia, and that Epstein is still alive.

  4. Lysias says:

    Maybe John Roberts has a double.

  5. akaPatience says:

    While I’m not a fan of Chief Justice Roberts, “John Roberts” is undeniably a common name, and for all we know the Epstein flight log could’ve been in reference to FOX News reporter John Roberts.

  6. Leith says:

    Amazing that I for once agree with you Larry.

    Just one question though. you post implies there was someone named Roberts with Epstein. Who was that, was it an attempt to set up the real John Roberts?

    • Larry Johnson says:

      I doubt it. Just sloppy, careless analysis. All I did was check the court work schedule and compare the dates. Just requires a brain.

  7. Gallo Rojo says:

    The real blackmail leverage with Roberts is the questionable manner in which he adopted a set of twins from Ireland.

    • longarch says:

      @Gallo Rojo: Your comments led me to search for a PDF alluded to by Ziegler, titled “how roberts was blackmailed to support obamacare” so I thank you for that particular lead.

      Disclaimer: I do not have blind faith in anyone, including Larry Johnson, Lin Wood, or Garrett M. Ziegler. I don’t have a dog in this fight. I’m just trying to document who is flinging accusations at whom.

      I notice that Ziegler appears to be the person alluded to above, and he appears to have a Telegram account that links to PDF files, but I am not willing to sign up for Telegram just to get free access to his PDFs.

      At that account,

      Garrett M. Ziegler wrote the following:

      So, a former fed (CIA) by the name of Larry Johnson attacked Lin Wood for sharing a PDF I posted last night. Again, this PDF was put together by a friend and has some heretofore unexamined nodes, among which are John Roberts’s divesture of stock in Pfizer before ruling on vaccine liability shields. It also contained the dates and airport codes of two flights a John Roberts took on a plane associated w Epstein.

      Johnson’s article proves that he actually displays the carelessness which he accuses Lin of committing. He posits that because SCOTUS arguments were held in DC on 3/22/10, there is no way the Chief Justice would have been able to fly from Palm Beach to Oakland on 3/22/10. If Johnson would have actually dug a bit, he would realize that PTK—the destination on the flight logs—is the airport code of Oakland County, MICHIGAN, not CA, which undercuts really the only half-baked argument he was able to utter.

      For a second I thought Larry Johnson was talking about me, but then I realized he mentioned a Garret Ziegler/Zeigler, neither of which are me.

      I do not have enough facts on Ziegler’s PTK assertion to make a judgement at this time.

      • Larry Johnson says:

        Read the damn article. For starters, I cite the flight as OAKLAND, MICHIGAN. Garret cannot even get that fact straight. More importantly, whether it was Michigan or California, the Supreme Court Justice was hearing arguments in Washington, DC. Garret Ziegler is a sloppy, mendacious incompetent.

  8. mcohan says:

    John roberts is a gay porn star.It was him and epstein in the cockpit

  9. mcohen says:

    Larry calm down.

    John roberts is gay porn star.check it out.Secondly both epstein and maxwell are gay.I am not going to go into what they were doing with the young girls because it my ruin your side burns

Comments are closed.