A piece of news regarding the alleged Ashley Biden diary largely escaped notice–Project Veritas offices and James O’Keefe’s home were raided by the FBI last Thursday and Saturday because, according to Jack Hadfield of the National File:
A week and a half before the 2020 election, a Project Veritas whistleblower provided a digital copy of Ashley Biden’s diary to National File.
I do not believe in coincidence. This was a pretext to attack Project Veritas. Why did Jack Hadfield reveal the source of the diary on the one day before James O’Keefe’s home was raided? You cannot ignore the Deep State for a moment. They are like the Eye of Mordor constantly surveying the body politic for an opportunity to attack and infect. The initial reports about last week’s raids on the office of Project Veritas (PV) and the home of PV creator, James O’Keefe, were of two types–the New York Times was tipped off to a supoena that was supposed to be secret while many conservative bloggers (and Project Veritas) voiced consternation (rightly so!) over the FBI going after journalists.
The National File and some other bloggers and aspiring pundits are claiming this is “proof” that the Ashley Biden diary is true. But I think there is an alternative explanation–the diary is a fabrication and was given to Project Veritas three weeks before the 2020 Presidential election in order to distract attention from the Hunter Biden laptop story and ultimately discredit and prosecute Trump supporters who embraced the diary as legit.
Here is what we know about the diary. A person or persons not publicly identified approached PV in October 2020 with a copy of what was alleged to be the diary of Joe Biden’s daughter. According to James O’Keefe, PV tried to independently verify the legitimacy of the diary and decided not to publish and gave the material to law enforcement:
We investigated the claims provided to us, as journalists do. We took steps to corroborate the authenticity of the diary. At the end of the day, we made the ethical decision that because, in part, we could not determine if the diary was real, if the diary in fact belonged to Ashley Biden, or if the contents of the diary occurred, we could not publish the diary and any part thereof. We attempted to return the diary to an attorney representing Ms. Biden, but that attorney refused to authenticate it. Project Veritas gave the diary to law enforcement to ensure it could be returned to its rightful owner. We never published it.
But now the National File claims it was a “whistleblower” from Project Veritas who gave the National File’s Patrick Howley a copy of the diary (Howley published salacious portions of the alleged diary on 24 October 2020.
This raises two possibilities.
They are certainty after Project Veritas. There is plenty of corruption within this administration PV could be researching. According to James Okeefe, on Tucker Carlson tonight, the FBI seized two of his iPhones, which had confidential informant contact information, donor information, and other data related to what they are working on. I’m sure all of it is not related to the diary story. Then there is Durham and all his investigation implies.
It does seem like a set-up of some sort, the dynamics of which remain to be determined. And no doubt Project Veritas’ insightful reporting is a threat to corruptocrats, who surely want to destroy it.
The MSM didn’t know for certain if the “Steele Dossier” was “real” yet they ran with it anyway and that’s all we heard about for the next few years and beyond. So why aren’t they reporting on the salacious aspects of the Ashley Biden diary? That’s a rhetorical question of course. Inquiring minds want to know if Joe really did take showers with his young daughter, as is mentioned in the diary, or if he was the one who sexually molested her, as is also mentioned.
Didn’t his sister-in-law/girlfriend accuse Hunter Biden of exposing himself to her daughter/his niece? Maybe the apple didn’t fall far from the tree.
Larry, it’s just a suggestion but perhaps it’s time you gave poor Helen Keller a break and used some other famous blind people metaphorically, like Ray Charles, Stevie Wonder, Andrea Bocelli, or Christopher Wray.
April,
I use Helen because she was blind, deaf and dumb (intelligent but couldn’t speak). Your other suggestions are only blind or, in Wray’s case, terminally stupid.
Ah, I get it now. The incredibly accomplished Helen Keller was a Triple Threat. The others, not so much.
Time to now call it The Clinton Dossier, not the Steele Dossier.
Larry…Good Job..I think you are Right on This One..Makes Sense to me…
The Deep State does not like it when somebody gets inside their OODA Loop; they like to think that they are the only ones entitled to this tactic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OODA_loop
When they get pwned, they try to get people locked up and squelched. Witness Julian Assange and Wikileaks, among others, and now they are trying to work the same trick on Project Veritas. Wikileaks was compromised by an Icelandic pedophile in the organization that they put the arm on; help us out, you little perv, or else. Maybe a similar weak link was found at PV, or maybe it was a plant. It comes to a similar end; i.e., disabling journalists who expose the Deep State for what it is. My revulsion for the Fascist Bureau of Inquisition knows no bounds. It’s a lot to wish for, but I hope they come to a bad end.