Rittenhouse Prosecutors Really Screw the Pooch

Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder felt compelled to publicly chastise Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger on multiple occasions for violating the court’s rulings on inadmissible evidence, as well as for what the judge called the “grave constitutional violation” of casting suspicion on Rittenhouse’s right to remain silent.

Binger’s failure to uphold the constitution was matched by the dearth of evidence he presented to the jury.  If you have been reading Gateway Pundit you are up to date on the prosecutorial bungles:

Clown Show: Kenosha Prosecutor Claims Violent Mob Of Rioters That Attacked Kyle Rittenhouse Were “Heroes” Who “Did The Right Thing” (Video)

BREAKING: Kyle Rittenhouse Weapons Charge Dismissed – Huge Win for Rittenhouse Team — LIVE STREAM VIDEO

EXCLUSIVE: Potential Witness Tampering as Gaige Grosskreutz, the Felon Who Aimed His Gun at Kyle Rittenhouse, Had Two Prior Charges Dismissed by Prosecutors Only Days Before Trial

Moving the Goalposts: Kyle Rittenhouse Prosecution Pushes a “Multitude” of Lesser Crimes In Last-Ditch Attempt to Secure Some Jail Time

Tough Day for Prosecutors of Kyle Rittenhouse

Binger put witnesses on the stand that rebutted his own case. The biggest blow-up came courtesy of Gaige Grosskreutz, who admitted he was carrying illegally a semi-automatic pistol and pointed it at Kyle Rittenhouse (read here).

I want to believe that Thomas Binger really is this dumb and this incompetent. But the number of egregious errors makes me wonder if this is not a deliberate effort to tank the case in order to have the judge intervene and prevent Binger from being blamed for failing to convict an 18-year-old kid who was just trying to help protect his community because the police failed to do their job. We will know soon.

I want to believe that Thomas Binger really is this dumb and this incompetent. But the number of egregious errors makes me wonder if this is not a deliberate effort to tank the case in order to have the judge intervene and prevent Binger from being blamed for failing to convict an 18-year-old kid who was just trying to help protect his community because the police failed to do their job. We will know soon

This entry was posted in Larry Johnson. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Rittenhouse Prosecutors Really Screw the Pooch

  1. Babeltuap says:

    Mistrial. Are they really going to live with death threats the rest of their life over this kid who Biden suggested was a white supremacist:

    https://news.yahoo.com/jen-psaki-sighs-fox-reporter-162645404.html

    I highly doubt it. The pointing of the rifle with the index on the trigger at the jury was no accident; it was a message.

  2. Fred says:

    Pointing the rifle at people in the trial is the least egregious thing he’s done. Withholding evidence and witnesses far exceeds that. The left needs a directed verditct – so they can condemn the judiciary, or a mistrial – so they can continue to condemn the concept of a right to self defense. The press, fresh off earning those Pulitizers for Russia Collusion coverage – stands ready to condemn the young man who would in a fair trial be found ‘not guilty’. Why a city 83% white would riot over a white suspect who shot three white guys and is found not guilty at trial is not a question reasonable people should ask. The press sure won’t.

  3. BillWade says:

    Pinky Floyd’s nephew, and others, makes threats to intimidate the jury, the judge and family have received death threats, the prosecutor aims an AR-15 in the court, plus crucial evidence withheld by the prosecution, if the Rule of Law keeps getting trashed we’ll soon enough have war lords running our favellas.

  4. lysias says:

    Looks like the left wants riots.

  5. robt willmann says:

    The first questions about the drone video and its fuzzy and clearer versions is whether it is complete and not edited, and whether the clearer version is the clearest edition, or whether there is another one that has a still better resolution. This also goes for the forward looking infrared (FLIR) sensor’s video. Apparently the FLIR video came from the FBI. Was that the case with the drone video? Are there other images in video form from the FBI or other governmental agency or contractor that have not been revealed?

    The FBI has been known to say they cannot find something they had in their possession, as was the case with text messages between former FBI agent Peter Strzok and his paramour, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page. After Attorney General Jeff Sessions said “we will leave no stone unturned” to find them, the text messages were located.

    The drone video that is discussed in the British Daily Mail article, and in another motion for a mistrial with prejudice by Kyle Rittenhouse, is said to be at least in part shown here–
    https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1460817948596183044

  6. JK/AR says:

    Here in Arkansas I’d call that brandishing and were I in Wisconsin and carrying my legally permitted weapon, it would appear, Wisconsin would call it that too:

    https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/941/III/20

    Binger, obviously, graduated the Alec Baldwin Academy of Firearms Safety.

    • Pat Lang says:

      JK/AR
      I have told you people not to post links here without your thoughts.

      • JK/AR says:

        Aye aye Sir.

        I have very closely attended to this trial. State’s presentation of the full 11+MB – rather than what Defense got in its 4MB turnover of *available evidence – and given as Defense’s expert [Black] stating for the record occurred in 0.74 seconds. Further State in its presentation to the jury prefaced “We’re going to present this [evidence] ‘at half its speed.’ ”

        You and I Colonel Lang, aware as we are of, in what’s known in civilian circles as ‘The Tueller Drill”

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og28YV8DUxw

        Almost certainly “appreciate” that the human Mind&Time can and (more frequently than not in my experience) does ‘play tricks’ on an individual’s perception of What the hell just happened? and how do I process that?

        I can only offer Sir that that [previously seen] Babylon Bee piece only occurred to me after I’d clicked on the ‘Post Comment’ Unconsidered to your prior, standing order.

        I regret Sir, my doing so and will from here on out, heed both the intent and the spirit of your House Rules.

        Yes Sir. I _[messed]_ up and submit myself to the authority of the Court.

  7. Jim S says:

    Baba Yetu – Peter Hollens & Malukah
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17svtURunUK
    The same with lyrics
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-bxfhxGaos

    May Kyle Rittenhouse and Alec Baldwin receive the same justice: fair and impartial. And if Man’s justice should falter and stumble, may the Lord extend His justice to both men, as well as His mercy, should they accept it.

  8. Fred says:

    Looks like the DA not only witheld high def video but knowingly doctored what was given. Those acts should result in disbarment at a minimum.

  9. JK/AR says:

    Colonel Lang, Sir.

    As the court’s video seems to be down at present – 1300 – here’s a “lawyer’s diiscussion” going on which – I would suggest; needs be backed to a startpoint some thirty (30) minutes prior to the point – 1400 – “ought be considered.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ids0kzPhl08

    – Whether “our Justice System” is capable (given as I understand, some of our government agencies systems date back to COBOL – I have some real doubt) Regardless, here we are and whether Justice as we’ve understood it previously can exist side-by-side with “as the Framers intended” to “the Present State of Technology” I, personally, extremely doubt.

    [In the one hundred ten or so minutes I’ve taken to “proof” this comment; It wouldn’t surprise me at all to find there’s more scope I’ve … in this ‘computer-age’ there’s no benefit of hindsight acceptable … failed to account.]

    This ‘Age of Aquarious’ looks to me at present – not as promising as it was previously advertised.

Comments are closed.