The Battle of Panama Continues

 China tells state firms to halt deals with Li Ka-shing and his family, Bloomberg News reports

(Reuters) – Hong Kong’s CK Hutchison will not sign a deal next week to sell its two port operations near the Panama Canal to a BlackRock-led group, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said, amid growing pressure from Beijing. China’s market regulator said it will carry out an antitrust review on the Panama port deal in accordance with law to protect fair competition and safeguard public interests, its official WeChat account showed late on Friday.

The telecoms-to-retail conglomerate owned by tycoon Li Ka-shing this month agreed to sell most of the global $22.8 billion ports business, including assets it holds along the strategically important Panama Canal, to a group led by BlackRock.

Definitive documentation for the two port operations near the Panama Canal was expected to be signed by April 2, according to the sale announcement made on March 4. One of the people, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter, did not elaborate, saying only that the definite documentation would not be signed due to “obvious reasons”. The person added the development does not mean the deal has been called off, and April 2 is not a hard deadline. The second source, who also declined to be identified for similar reasons, said talks are still very much underway.

Negotiation for the overall deal that covers a total of 43 ports in 23 countries is on exclusive basis between CK Hutchison and the consortium for 145 days. Local media including Singtao Daily and The South China Morning Post first reported the news. CK Hutchison did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

The conglomerate has been caught in China’s crosshairs in the highly politicised deal which is expected to garner the firm more than $19 billion in cash. Chinese authorities have reacted negatively to plans by the conglomerate to sell its ports assets, while the deal was hailed by U.S. President Donald Trump who said he wants to retake control of the strategic waterway. Over the past two weeks, pro-Beijing Hong Kong newspaper Ta Kung Pao has published a series of commentaries criticising the deal for harming China’s national interests and depicting it as a betrayal of China and is a “perfect cooperation” with the U.S. strategy to contain China. China’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office reposted some of the commentaries on its website, which fueled speculation Beijing could take steps to try to scupper the sale.

A CK Hutchison unit operates two of the five ports adjacent to the Panama Canal, which manages about 3% of the global sea-borne trade. Panama first awarded the concession to the company in 1998 to run the ports and extended it for another 25 years in 2021. Beijing’s criticism of CK Hutchison’s move to sell its ports business is a precursor to heightened political scrutiny of major Chinese business divestments involving American buyers, analysts have said.

Bloomberg News, earlier in the week, reported that Chinese authorities had told state-owned firms to hold off on any new deals with businesses linked to tycoon Li and his family.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/ck-hutchison-not-sell-strategic-105813668.html

Comment: If I was a member of the Li family, I wouldn’t be making any long term plans. That last warning issued by the Chinese authorities is ominous. Someone could end up with a bullet in the head or making little rocks out of big rocks.

Seems the Chinese government does consider the CK Hutchison ownership of two ports at either end of the Panama Canal a strategic asset, not just another commercial arrangement. Until today, I thought The buyout of CK Hutchinson’s interest in the ports by Blackrock would defuse the issue. It wouldn’t have been an outright ownership by the US, but it would have ended Chinese ownership. The CK Hutchison Ports group operates 43 ports in 23 countries, including two of the four major ports that exist along the Panama Canal. The deal would have given the BlackRock consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including Mexico, the Netherlands, Egypt, Australia, Pakistan and elsewhere. The Blackrock ownership of all those ports would have given Trump something akin to a British East India Company.

Trump should have been briefed on this by now, but given how he’s been caught ignorant of major events lately, he may still think the Blackrock deal is a go. Wait until he catches up with reality. He will be livid. He’s going to go all Red Queen on China and Panama. Send the fleet! Drop the paratroopers! Or maybe he’ll do something with a little more finesse. But I’m not sure if his national security team is up for it.

TTG

This entry was posted in China, Panama, TTG. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to The Battle of Panama Continues

  1. morongobill says:

    Expect more activity on the Greenland front then.

  2. leith says:

    TTG –

    There is a distinctly orange face on that Red Queen image. Should we congratulate you for that, or Disney?

    • TTG says:

      leith,

      I didn’t notice the orange face until you mentioned it. Pure serendipity. Now I think I’ll keep that image for future use.

  3. leith says:

    It’s not just Panamanian ports. CK Hutchison also has 21 ports in 21 in Europe and Asia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutchison_Port_Holdings#Port_assets

    Plus other Chinese state-owned firms are “active stakeholders in an estimated 78 ports across 32 African countries as builders, financiers, or operators.”:
    https://africacenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/China-Africa-Port-Map-FINAL.jpg

  4. babelthuap says:

    This is where USAID funny money would have come in handy. Fund all the TV stations like in Ukraine and start a color revolution sabotaging and killing people. TTG I think you are correct on head shots.

  5. Fred says:

    “…Hong Kong newspaper Ta Kung Pao has published a series of commentaries criticising the deal for harming China’s national interests…”

    China’s national interest? Imagine a government being concerned about their nation’s interest. Who was watching out for US national interest in 1998 when Panama signed that first deal? Hilary’s husband. Surprise, surprise. And in 2021 who failed to watch out for US national interest? Hunter’s laptop owner’s dad.

    “The Blackrock ownership of all those ports would have given Trump something akin to a British East India Company.”

    TTG you are remarkably illinformed of the political leanings of the leadership of BlackRock. Or very poorly deflecting attention from them.

    • TTG says:

      Fred,

      Blackrock ownership of those ports means they would be operated for the profit/interest of Blackrock, not China. I’m sure Trump would prefer Blackrock ownership rather than Hutchison ownership even though they lean towards woke issues. They’re still a big investor in clean, beautiful coal.

  6. LeaNder says:

    Li Ka-shing looks like a prototype of the American success story—a lot more impressive than brand Trump, really. He may not like that. Considering his struggle with Forbes to get higher on their list. 😉

    (Could) end up making little rocks out of big rocks? Labor camp?

  7. Yeah, Right says:

    TTG: “Someone could end up with a bullet in the head or making little rocks out of big rocks.”

    Just like Jack Ma who disappeared and… no, wait, there he is. Nevermind.

    • TTG says:

      Guo Guangchang disappears after calling Xi a clown. Xiao Jianhua was abducted by Chinese security agents from Hong Kong. In 2022, he was sentenced to 13 years in prison for fraud and corruption. Bao Fan was taken by authorities and held incognito for a few days. At least he wasn’t jailed, but did have to resign from his business. Even Jack Ma had to go through some things for angering the authorities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *