In their June 16 telephone conversation, Presidents Biden and Putin discussed the possibility of US intelligence personnel operating out of Russian military bases in Central Asia to monitor Afghanistan, following the complete US and NATO withdrawal, now expected to be completed by August 31. While the Biden Administration has not yet responded to the Putin offer, and may still be pursuing permission from some Central Asian states to give permission for US military bases, the idea of such a cooperative approach has great merit.
For several years, the US and Russia have successfully maintained a deconfliction process in Syria. The goal was to avoid any direct military engagement while both countries were conducting separate military operations against the Islamic State and other jihadist forces. Accounts from US and Russian participants in the program indicated that coordination between the two forces was professional, effective, and built lines of communication.
While the Russian offer and Afghan circumstances are different, the success of the deconfliction program indicates that cooperation between US and Russian military and intelligence agencies is possible, particularly where there are areas of clear common interest. Russia (as well as China, Iran, India, and the Central Asian states bordering on Afghanistan) all have a common interest in preventing Afghanistan from serving as a secure base of operations for Chechen, Uyghur, Baluchi, and other terrorist and separatist groups. The entire US mission in Afghanistan–before it veered off course–was all about stopping Afghanistan from ever serving again as a staging area for an attack on the US or allies as happened on September 11, 2001.
Following the 911 attack, Russia provided logistical assistance to the US intervention to overthrow the Taliban and hunt down Al Qaeda. So there is precedent for US-Russian cooperation in preventing Afghanistan from once again harboring international terrorists.
No one is certain about what will follow the US/NATO withdrawal. Will the current negotiations in Doha between the Kabul government and the Taliban produce a government of national unity or will Taliban overwhelm the government forces and reestablish control over the country? Will Taliban 2021 be the same as the brutal medieval fundamentalist regime of the mid-1990s? The common answer to all those questions is “We don’t yet know.”
All the more reason for the United States and Russia to work together to assure that whatever happens inside Afghanistan will not spill over into a new resurgence of global terrorism.
Donate
Browse by category
Recent Comments
- TTG on Supreme Court oral arguments to be heard on April 25 about presidential immunity for official acts
- babelthuap on Supreme Court oral arguments to be heard on April 25 about presidential immunity for official acts
- Keith Harbaugh on The battle for Ocheretyne
- Mark Logan on Supreme Court oral arguments to be heard on April 25 about presidential immunity for official acts
- TTG on Supreme Court oral arguments to be heard on April 25 about presidential immunity for official acts
Browse archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
RSS
- The battle for Ocheretyne
- Supreme Court oral arguments to be heard on April 25 about presidential immunity for official acts
- Nasa’s Voyager-1 sends usable data from deep space
- The Wondrous Oak
- Three Seas Summit: Vilnius 2024
- Tit for tat until it all goes boom
- Deadly H5N1 avian influenza strain detected on mainland Antarctica
- “BYD is launching its next-gen Blade EV battery soon with more range and even lower cost”
- Iran launches air attacks on Israel
- ISW on the developing Ukrainian defense industrial base and Russias strikes on the Ukrainian energy infrastructure
Meta
The Russian offer was for multi-purpose use of their Central Asian bases. Biden has not responded. IMO the Taliban have not changed at all. They may settle for a puppet government in Kabul but that will mean nothing for the fate of the secularized Afghan part of the population.
Harper
I may be wrong, but I took this as another example of Vladimirovich’s ice dry sense of humor – schadenfreude in this case. Can anyone really imagine the US taking up this offer and the Russian domestic & international PR opportunities that would result? The mighty CIA reduced to the charity of that gas station masquerading as a country – really?
Aside from this, such visible cooperation would imperil the entire Russophobic punditocracy. Sadly I think the Forever Enemy narrative will be maintained, even at the cost of ‘losing’ Afghanistan.
Barbara Ann
I can imagine it.
It would sure represent a watershed in relations. Despite my cynicism I hope it comes to pass.
Barbara Ann,
Perhaps Putin is interested in stabilizing Afghanistan at a level beneficial for Russia. Hosting US IC personnel under close supervision would be an acceptable cost for this purpose.
Ishmael Zechariah
IZ
That is quite likely I think and the DoD may even be amenable to such a plan. But a stable Afghanistan is probably the last thing the Neocons want, now that the pullout is almost done. If the offer is taken up it will be a very good sign for who is calling the shots in DC.
BTW, did you see the Taliban’s pretty unequivocal response to Erdogan’s plans to run HKI airport? He is apparently negotiating with the Taliban now. I just can’t understand the motivation for a plan which seems to have little upside in currying favor with Washington and a whole lot of downside risk. Neo-Ottomanism trumping good sense?
Barbara Ann
We have no choice but to keep the airport open as a way out. We can hope the Turks or someone, anyone, keeps it open or we can go back in and hold it open ourselves for a while. This is not like VN. There is no nearby seacoast and no massive fleet waiting offshore to which it is a short ride.
A very good point. I could actually see the Turks getting the job, after negotiations with the Taliban. But it would surely be on the promise to hand it over by a certain date. This would in theory give the remaining US personnel the chance to leave. The Taliban’s current position is that it will tolerate diplomats only remaining.
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2021/07/21/662762/Taliban-Afghanistan-press-tv
Yes. That airport must be held. Preferably if not by we, at least a (nominal?) ally such as Erdogan.
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4233z1.html
(I’m not, particularly, a RandFan but us having to overflight some hostile countries – probably some refuels too …)
Barbara Ann,
The airport gambit is simply tayyip trying to hire out TSK as mercenaries for filthy lucre. Stupid idea. I do not see how we can hold the place unless the Taliban strikes a deal.. I wonder what would be involved in such a deal; Talibs are shrewd camel traders.
Slightly OT: If you want to have some fun, read what Vicky Nuland, fresh from her success of fuxxing the EU and “cookieing” the Ukraine, is ordering tayyip to do about Cyprus.
Seems the “sultan” is running out of money and out of options. The next year might be fun.
Ishmael Zechariah
CIA would be the people arming and training Uyghars with help from the likes of Saudi wahhabist friends.
Harper
A follow up, if I may, on the possibility of US/Russia cooperation on Afghanistan: This week the US resumed airstrikes on the Taliban, in Helmand and Kandahar I think. This would seem to be in direct contravention of the 2020 Doha agreement which specifically forbids the US “intervening” in “[Afghanistan’s] domestic affairs”.
Yesterday’s readout of the latest Biden/Ghani telecon includes the following: “President Biden and President Ghani agreed that the Taliban’s current offensive is in direct contradiction to the movement’s claim to support a negotiated settlement of the conflict”. This looks like an implicit statement that the US considers the Doha agreement void.
It seems the Russians are livid with the resumption of US strikes which it sees as a demonstration that the ground forces withdrawal is simply a change of tactics, to be replaced with CENTCOM’s “over the horizon capabilities” in order to prop up the Ghani govt indefinitely. This may explain the claim of US/IS cooperation made by Maria Zakharova on Thursday.
On the practical front, it would be interesting to know whether these “over the horizon capabilities” may be enough to keep the Kabul govt. going and if so for how long. Whether this encourages the Taliban to sue for peace, or the opposite, is another important question.