“Nasr min Allah! Nasr min Allah!” (a victory from God Almighty) Somebody show this to Trump!

Armred car

One of our correspondents was kind enough to send me this link.  We should all watch it.  It has a quality much like "The Battle of San Pietro,"  a film from the Italian Campaign in WW2.

It depicts a running battle through the mountains along the excellent road from Najran City as the Saudi and and allied Yemeni forces (referred to as traitors in the film) flee to the east trying to escape the giant, well laid ambush that was set as a trap by the Houthis and the Salih loyalist part of the Yemeni Army.

Evidently the senior Saudi commanders mostly deserted their men and fled early and swiftly.  As a result the Saudi forces surrendered en masse, abandoning armored vehicles and civilian type trucks stuffed full of weapons, supplies and ammunition.  Many of the vehicles, including armored vehicles are in running condition and in the film one can see Yemeni soldiers mount the vehicles and drive them off  Among these vehicles are fully tracked M-113 US made APCs that are carriers for radar trained air defense Gatling guns,   These will be very useful in the future.

Some of the vehicles are marked in Arabic as belonging to the Saudi National Guard (SANG) and from their condition I suppose that these troops were from the Modernized SANG that the US has worked hard to train and equip for fifty years or more.  The easy surrender of these beduins is very bad news for the Saudi monarchy.

The many, many prisoners seem to be humanely treated.  There are Houthi medical personnel on the scene treating enemy wounded.  If I were the Rebel commander I would truck all these prisoners down to Sanaa and invited the International Red Cross and UN in to register them and start a stream of food, water and shelter supplies coming in to care for all these men.

Someone please show President Trump this film.  It makes the lies of creatures like Pompeo obvious.


This entry was posted in Saudi Arabia, The Military Art, Yemen. Bookmark the permalink.

48 Responses to “Nasr min Allah! Nasr min Allah!” (a victory from God Almighty) Somebody show this to Trump!

  1. Babak Makkinejad says:

    They are referring to Quran, 61-13 https://quran.com/61/13

  2. semiconscious says:

    thanks very much for this. looking forward to the msm take on this ‘alleged’ victory…

  3. Babak, That’s pretty powerful.
    “And [you will obtain] another [favor] that you love – victory from Allah and an imminent conquest; and give good tidings to the believers.”
    Although I doubt the evidence of this military victory will have any effect on Pompeo or Trump, I hope it finds a widespread audience within Saudi Arabia and the other Peninsular states. The “guardians of Mecca” are not who they say they are. I remember talking with you about taking the Saudi Royal’s money through a hacking operation some time ago. I’ve talked with many incredibly talented young people in the Mideast, including Yemen, who may be able to pull this off. Now would be a perfect time for some group, with whatever sympathetic international help they can muster, to do just that.

  4. Fred says:

    Maybe Trump will suggest they change leadership on the battlefield and suggest somebody who, unlike all those Chochise types in the hills who are kicking thier asses, went to West Point. In fact they deserve somebody who was first in his class….

  5. luke8929 says:

    Those 8 wheeled tired vehicles, some of which are on fire, look like the vehicles General Dynamics Canada sold to the Saudi’s, looked at some pictures online but couldn’t tell for sure, anyone know? If they are the current PM Justin said he didn’t cancel the contract because they where only “Jeeps”, you know like the YJ in your neighbors driveway, his father must be rolling in his grave.
    His Majesty Justin’s motorcade went by my house earlier on his way to back YVR and his Jet aircraft, full police escort, Police motorcycles, armored limo etc, he was here lecturing us on climate change and how we must reduce our CO2 footprint, only for the little people of course, Canadians must be the biggest Hippocrates in the world or at least in the running.

  6. FkDahl says:

    Was the motorcade blaring ACDC’s “Back in Black”?

  7. MP98 says:

    Why are these people fighting (and dying) over worthless desert?

  8. turcopolier says:

    It is their homeland. Al watn! Are you so soulless as to ask that question?

  9. turcopolier says:

    No idea what you are talking bout.

  10. susan c says:

    Hi Colonel
    The commenter fkdahl was referring to the fact Trudeau the younger has enjoyed wearing blackface on several occasions. He’s since been referred to as Canada’s first black prime minister.

  11. Jack says:

    This should scare MbS. He would be smart to end this war and pay the Houthis for reconstruction.

  12. oldman22 says:

    Remarkable video. Many in sandals, the Houthi look lean and fit.
    It looks like the Houthi are all on foot! Is that possible? Most of the captured personnel carriers, they burn, no use for them? Many of the Toyota Land Cruisers and HiLux pickups, they fill with captured weapons and drive away.
    There was an hour long video on youtube with some of the same footage + more, but it has been removed as too graphic.
    So it’s OK to sell Saudis bombs and refuel their planes so they can bomb Yemen, but it’s too graphic to watch the Saudis get defeated by the Houthi.
    Here is the old link to youtube, now removed. If you know where to find a copy, please post it.

  13. f77 says:

    Worthless to you, to them (the Houthis) its their homeland

  14. Christian J Chuba says:

    I love how much skepticism the U.K. and other western outlets have about the Houthi claims. They must be confusing the Houthis with the White Helmets, as if the Houthis have a massive media budget that they can stage a fake victory, as if they so much extra equipment that they can arrange expensive looking trucks at a moments notice.

  15. The Beaver says:

    Affirmative Canadian-made LAV armoured vehicles
    some videos from this Iraqi Twitter account:

  16. FkDahl says:

    The Trudeau motorcade … there is currently in Canada a political storm over Trudeau in his younger days (ie just a few years ago) on at least three occasions showing up in blackface. Back in black is a reference this political incident.

  17. Dave Schuler says:

    That should be a reminder that we should not sell anything to the Saudis that we are not willing to allow to fall into the hands of those who might wish to do us harm. The Saud family’s rule is not that robust and there is no controlling who will succeed them.
    It should be such a reminder but it won’t be.

  18. prawnik says:

    Only if he leads from the front lines.

  19. Rick Merlotti says:

    Amazing footage. Scrappy Yemenis deliver MBS a MBS (Major Bitch Slap).

  20. oldman22 says:

    When I watched video of Houthi attack, I kept thinking “Where is the Saudi air force, where are the Saudi helicopters?”
    This might be an answer:
    “> The large-scale operation was preceded by Yemeni rocket artillery targeting Jizan airport, with 10 missiles paralyzing any movements to and from the airport, including denying the possibility of air support for the encircled troops. The Houthis also hit the King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh in a key operation that targeted Apache helicopters, forcing them to leave the area. Nearby military bases were also targeted so as to cut off any reinforcements and disrupt the chain of command. This led to the Saudi forces fleeing in disorganization.
    > Houthi forces employed drones, missiles, anti-aircraft systems, as well as electronic warfare to prevent the Saudis from supporting their troops with aviation or other means to assist their trapped men.”

  21. oldman22 says:

    ACDC is a band, and “Back in Black” is one of their songs.
    Not my kind of music, just trying to answer your question.
    I am more into Chopin.

  22. turcopolier says:

    TTG believes that Trump is utterly irredeemable and stupid to boot. I think Trump is persuadable and does not like losers. TTG is correct about Pompeo. Unfrtuntely he may be president someday.

  23. turcopolier says:

    you will probably have to wait a long time.

  24. turcopolier says:

    It could have been “Who let the dogs out?”

  25. turcopolier says:

    my impression is that the burning vehicles were either set on fire as part of combat damage (these things catch fire easily)or they were burned by the Saudis before they ran.

  26. JamesT says:

    Google shills for the neocons.

  27. oldman22 says:

    You may be right. But in the longer video (the one now censored by youtube) there are Houthi setting fire to some heavy vehicles, which I believe were Canandian or UK made personnel carriers. First they remove lots of fancy weapons, then they sprinkle gasoline and light it up.

  28. Erwin says:

    The Saudis were filmed bombing their own surrendering troops in the video I watched. The Houthis tried to give aid to some that were hit – there was a glimpse of a mercenary completely blown in half at the waist.
    At this point I think a solid Houthi advance deep into Saudi territory would trigger an all out revolt. Those new armored vehicles are going to come in handy 🙂

  29. turcopolier says:

    Yes. I don’t have that footage. These may be vehicles that are not “runners” or maybe the Yemenis don’t have enough people who can drive them and have decided to abandon them.

  30. DH says:

    My sister on the Nakba: “It was a desert they weren’t doing anything with.” LOL

  31. JP Billen says:

    Mostly Canadian made LAVs from what I saw. But armor does not fit into Houthi tactics IMO. So they destroyed the ones that were still operable.

  32. JP Billen says:

    The Saudis had could not defeat the Houthis back in 1934 either.
    I’ve started rereading Robert Lacey’s 1981 book titled ‘The Kingdom’. He relates that in the spring of 1934 Abdul Aziz intended to conquer all of Yemen like he had done earlier with the Hejaz in the west and the Ha’il region in the north.
    Two large Saudi armies of Wahhabi Ikhwan under Princes Sa’ud and Faisal “advanced southwards in a pincer movement designed to capture the isolated and sparsely populated kingdom that stretched from Asir down to the borders of Britain’s Aden Protectorate.”
    Prince Faisal’s army advanced south along the flat Tihama plain of the Red Sea Coast without major resistance. He captured Asir and Jizan. His elder brother Sa’ud advanced into the buzzsaw of Houthi hill people in the north Yemen cliffs and passes. The Ikhwan horsemen were used to open desert country and were completely flummoxed. So Abdul Aziz negotiated a peace.
    A year later in Mecca, three Yemenis made an assassination attempt with daggers on King Abdul Aziz. His burly son Sa’ud saved him by intervening and took a nasty gash on his shoulder, so was back in the good graces of his father and later became king himself. 30 years later in the 1960s the Saudis publicly executed 17 Yemenis after a series of bomb explosions within Saudi Arabia.
    And now 85 years later there is still bad blood between the Yemenis and Saudis. The Houthis have never needed Iranian encouragement to hate Al Saud.

  33. Oldman22, that “Strategic Culture” article is excellent. I was wondering if there was any part of this operation that extended beyond the immediate battlefield. The Houthis executed what the US call deep battle. They used their missile forces to interdict the Saudi Air Force before they could leave the airbases and did the same to possible Saudi ground force reinforcements. Federico Pieraccini, the author, has good sources and good analytical skills. I don’t know what his background is, but I’ll be reading more of his work.
    The Houthi ground victory was a glowing example of what well led and well trained and motivated light infantry can do. We felt we were in the same position in the 25th ID in the hollow Army days of the 70s. At that time the division consisted of 9 light infantry battalions (3 were HARNG). The entire division posessed 3 M-551 Sheridan tanks in a ground cav troop. We had no body armor and no 100lb rucksacks. We were light and fast. Our primary mission was to reinforce Korea, of course. We were also slated to reinforce Europe because we were so mobile. We trained to fight Soviet mechanized and motorized divisions. It can be done as the Houthis proved.

  34. JamesT says:

    oldman22 – thank you for that interesting link.

  35. makkiarubra says:

    Setting on fire Saudi vehicles with a lighter is sort of Houtis’ signature.
    “Our 50¢ lighter against your 100,000s$ war machines”

  36. turcopolier says:

    JP Billen
    That is too easy an explanation. I saw quite a few driven off.

  37. Lars says:

    I do not have nearly the analytical skills regarding this than you do, but I think that the attack on the oil facilities and the outcome of this combat signifies a tipping point. The old expression about a paper tiger may apply to the Saudis.
    One thing I know, and I concur with your view of Donald Trump, and that is that the US response to this will be misguided. Not to mention inadequate and too late.
    I have long maintained that this area has been fought over for at least 10K years and no end is in sight. To think the US can change this is pure folly.

  38. turcopolier says:

    JP Billen
    Tell us what your military qualifications are.

  39. PavewayIV says:

    Oldman22 – I agree that the apparent* lack of Saudi coalition air support is strange, and markedly so. But I can’t see how Yemeni rocket/drone attacks could have possibly grounded all 100+ Saudi and 100+ ‘coalition partners’ aircraft, as well as all the attack helicopters at every military airfield in southwest Saudi Arabia. That just beggars belief – this operation took a day or two, not a couple of hours. The civilian side of mixed-use airports like Jizan, Abha or Riyadh might temporarily shut down, but the military side? It’s not like Yemen cratered the runways.
    The two Patriot batteries believed to be in the south have been successful in taking out *some* Yemeni missiles, so it’s not like the airfields are defenseless.
    This seems more like lack of will on the Saudi coalition AF’s part to risk any of their aircraft for actual ground support. Dumping precision-guided munition loads from 20k ft. (6,100m) safely above MANPADS range is about all they seem capable of doing. You need to be much lower for any kind of close air support. Really bad optics on the Saudis’ part if they expect to hire more mercs.
    Another possibility is they ran out of pilots. There’s supposedly only a handful of qualified Saudi pilots that fly any Yemeni missions. They rely heavily on ‘coalition partner’ pilots and contractors (UAE uses both). If UAE stopped flying Saudi missions (no idea) then there may just not be the right number or mix of Saudi pilots/aircraft types to do anything.
    If Saudis use contract pilots, then they probably haven’t been paid in a long time – just like their grunt mercs (Sudanese, Paki, whatever) the Saudis have been stiffing. They must really be broke. Those Canadian LAV IIIs the Houthis captured, rolled or burnt? The Saudis are late paying for them – something like $1.6 billion so far. The Saudis still haven’t paid that few hundred million for U.S. mid-air refueling – it’s been months since that was reported.
    *’apparent’ because I’m going entirely by the brief mention and segment of a Saudi coalition airstrike in the Houthi videos. Not sure if that was the Saudis trying to kill their own surrendering merc forces or if they were really trying to hit the Houthis. KSA, coalition cronies and MSM have been silent so far. Probably trying to find a reason to blame it on Iran.

  40. jd hawkins says:

    I would separate the Canadian people from their hypocritical ‘leadership’.

  41. jd hawkins says:

    It’s always best to turn one’s brain on before opening their mouth… even for food!
    No offense if [that] is beyond your control.

  42. JP Billen says:

    Minimal. Just an old man in an armchair who has a passion for history and its connections to the here and now.

  43. prawnik says:

    They may also be concerned with GPS tracking hidden on the vehicles, or that the vehicles will slow them down, limit the Houthis’ mobility to the places where such a vehicle can be driven, or otherwise be a target for Saudi aircraft and helicopters.

  44. turcopolier says:

    I would vote for a combination of – a shortage of pilots and – fear of ground fire. After all, who wants to die as an employee of the House of Saud? These guys join the air force for the foreign training and the fun of flying.

  45. Leith says:

    That the Saudis tried to use them in this steep mountainous terrain is criminal negligence. Plus the terrified drivers fleeing turned them over like turtles on their backs with belly up. You can’t run those things cross-slope. Center of gravity is too high making the roll angle much greater than in other mil vehicles. It’s not just the Canadians, the US Army Stryker and the Marines LAV-25 have the same issues. Too bad. They do well in flat, open country as light armoured recon.

  46. Paul Merrell says:

    The military vehicles would be only of limited use to the Houthis, since they have no supply chain for spare parts. So it makes sense for them to burn them before retreating, which denies their use to the Saudis. Light weapons and ammunition? Much more useful.

Comments are closed.