Saudi/US forces resume bombing Yemen targets.


"The Saudi Coalition has resumed their air campaign over Yemen this week after a short-lived peace deal was put in place following the Saudi Aramco strikes.

According to a new report from Yemen, the Saudi Coalition heavily bombed several sites inside the country, including a number of Houthi positions in the Amran and Dhale governorates."  AMN


My sources tell me that Saudi/Yemen rebels talks were held for several days this week following the Yemeni air attacks at Abqaiq and Kharais.  These Talks were held in Muscat, Oman under the protection of Sultan Qaboos, ruler of Oman.

Yesterday Pompeo scoffed at the idea that the Yemeni rebels had carried out the air attacks.  Well, pilgrims, the willingness of the Saudis to negotiate with them over the issue belies that.

And now, Saudi Arabia (with US air refueling and targeting assistance) has suddenly resumed bombing of Yemeni targets.  IMO the neocon dominated government of the US has pressured the Saudis to do this to support Pompeo's assertion.

The Yemeni rebels have stated that if the Saudis and the UAE do not want a negotiated peace, then attacks on these two countries will resume.  We will see.  pl

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to Saudi/US forces resume bombing Yemen targets.

  1. JamesT says:

    I hear Tulsi has made the next debate. The Hill was asking who she is going to “kneecap” next. I bet it is going to be Warren, and I bet it is going to be about Yemen/KSA.

  2. ambrit says:

    I have noticed that, as far as my public news sources are concerned, the Houthies have refrained from molesting international sea traffic passing through the Straits of Bab al Mandab. Is there a possible scenario where the Houthies try to close off those straits for political ends? If their rocket forces can hit installations deep within Saudi Arabia, closing a waterway right next door should be simple.

  3. closing a waterway right next door should be simple.
    I am not Colonel, but, if I may, hitting stationary large targets and moving ships requires a vastly different terminal guidance and a large amounts of explosives. It is a very different technology.

  4. fredw says:

    My first thought is that the Saudis think the Houthis gave this shot all they had. They can make or get more of these weapons, but they don’t have them now. In the short term it may be safe to attack them again. Knowing that things are likely to get dicey later.
    If that is the thinking, then the Houthis may need to establish a steady attack tempo before they get taken seriously. This will likely get harder with stepped up air defense and possible (announced but not specified) US intervention. Or not.
    The Saudis resuming aggressiveness just means that the combatants are still establishing each others’ strengths and perhaps weaknesses. Once they have sized each other up more accurately, the situation can be stabilized. In the meantime we get to see how nervous all this makes the world financial system. I think it might only take one more well conducted attack to re-panic the Saudis.

  5. jonst says:

    The US support for the Saudi efforts in Yemen seem to me to be a tragic (for the Yemenis) act of insanity. This kind of mindless and reckless policy has gone on far too long in the ME. However, sadly, I see no end to this in sight. Until we fall, inexorably, into some generational type disaster. Once again.

  6. PavewayIV says:

    And about that refueling…
    Facing Iran, Saudi Arabia still owes US $181 million for Yemen refueling

    WASHINGTON ― The Pentagon was set to outline new military options to President Donald Trump on Friday to respond to an attack on Saudi Arabia’s oil industry, but Riyadh still has an unpaid bill with the Pentagon for $181 million over assistance in Yemen.
    Despite the Trump administration’s emphasis on the U.S.-Saudi alliance in the wake of an attack that both sides attribute to Iran, Saudi Arabia has not repaid the Pentagon for its midair refueling assistance for its bombing runs over Yemen, nine months after the Pentagon announced it would seek to recoup its costs…

  7. walrus says:

    I imagine that there have been redoubled efforts by the West to find the sources of the technologies used by the Yemenis and destroy the associated logistics chain. I would also expect similar actions to find and destroy manufacturing/ launch sites.

    The big question for me is whether the Houthi have already got stocks of completed drones or enough parts sufficient for a similar size operation.
    My WAG is that the Houthi used everything they had in the last attack. That may mean a new attack is at least Six months away – too long for oil markets to care and way longer than U.S attention spans.
    If the Houthi want to continue to impress, then they should mount one or more attacks very quickly so as not to lose the momentum the first strike generated.
    My WAG is that Pompeo and the Neocons have told Saudi that the attack was a one off lucky shot and in any case we are adding more missile batteries, so continue your war…..
    What might be the reaction to a further successful attack apart from blaming Iran?

  8. Sbin says:

    MBS is stubborn
    Perhaps an attack on desalination facilities or the power plant running them would get his attention.

  9. Barbara Ann says:

    Unless the resumption is a short term face-saving exercise to cover an imminent deescalation and peace deal, this looks very bad indeed. If MbS has been persuaded that the US has his back so he can prosecute his war as before, it seems to me another Houthi attack is inevitable. The neocons will surely be ready with their “Iran dunnit” smoking gun when it comes.

  10. PeterHug says:

    I would expect that the next target will be a desalination plant.

  11. ambrit says:

    That would explain the occasional stories about Houthi ‘suicide’ boats. A different tool for a different target.
    Thanks. Nothing is ever as simple as we wish it were.
    A conspiracy theory thought; someone “finds” Iranian mines in the aforementioned strait. One can never be too cynical.
    As for the Yemen war, I remember seeing a video of some Houthi combatants during a battle. One of them was an old man shooting an old, probably ex-British Lee Enfield bolt action rifle. That level of determination is hard to beat. I imagine that to beat the Houthi, and keep them down, will require a large ground troop investment. The Brits finally gave up trying that back in 1967. I seem to remember another hill people who did similar to all comers.

  12. turcopolier says:

    the people the Brits were fighting then were Sunni villagers and townspeople, The Houthis are Fiver Shia mountain tribes from the north. they are tougher than Afghan pushtuns.

  13. Sbin says:

    Wealthy pampered and delusional is no match for hard men defending their territory.
    An ax handle to the head of MBS would be to sink his yacht with the fake Da Vinci on board.

  14. Fred says:

    Pompeo needs to be fired before he drags US into another war. Unlike walrus I suspect the Houthi’s have enough weapons for another strike for exactly the reasons walrus pointed to regarding a let up in pressure.

  15. Morongobill says:

    If the Houthi’s put as much thought into the next drone strike as they did the last one, it may put a real hurt on the oil markets.
    Also bravo for Tulsi making the next debate. The thing I’d like to see her “knee cap”
    is this neocon push to war.

  16. Johnb says:

    The intensive bombing may well be a provocation of the Houti to have them launch a less well prepared attack that can be blunted by revitalised and better focussed resources.

  17. ambrit says:

    “…tougher than Afghan pushtuns.”
    Says it all, doesn’t it.
    And, “Fiver Shia” as opposed to “Twelver Shia,” which is the branch most Persians adhere to. Would this be in any way similar to the sub-sects of Christian Protestantism? If so, the often asserted claims of Iranian ‘sponsorship’ of the Houthi would be somewhat compromised, no?
    Thanks for sharing your expertise.


    With their low view of their mullahs/sheikhs/imams, congregationalist models of community life, and sola scriptura approach to the Qur’an, and absence of a central authority, and emotionless religious experience, Sunnis resemble Calvinists more than Catholics.
    The Shia, on the other hand, have a strong emphasis on religious authority of their doctors of religion and the Pious References, veneration of their saints (the 14 Immaculate Ones), an approach to the Qur’an accenting both scripture and tradition; a deep mystical streak; devotion to a holy family; a theology of sacrifice and atonement through the death of Hussein, the son of Muhammad’s cousin Ali; belief in free will (as opposed to the Sunni doctrine of pre-destination); holy days, pilgrimages, and healing shrines; intercessory prayer; and strongly emotional forms of popular devotion, especially the festival of Ashoura commemorating Hussein’s death.
    In the United States, very many Iranian men are married to Catholic women.

  19. Stephanie says:

    We are sending four of these to KSA:
    according to:
    and 200 troops presumably to operate them.
    Deal is, they detect, although it is not absolutely clear they will detect cruise missiles flying low and fast, but the Patriots cannot shoot down those missiles flying low and fast (or any other missiles it would appear) so what difference will the radars make?
    But we have reached the moment where everything that happens in the ME is driven by domestic US politics. Everything we do is a political decision. So where do these radars fit in politically.
    Lastly, the Houthi’s are going to attack again and definitely it will not be a desalinization plant. That is a crime against humanity, and the Houthi’s will not go there. Perhaps a palace?

  20. ambrit says:

    Thank you for explaining the intricacies of the branches of Islam for me.
    The very thought of ‘Calvinist’ style Sunnis makes a lot of what goes on in the Middle East suddenly more understandable.

  21. turcopolier says:

    the similarity between different branches of Islam and those of Christianity are not very exact.

  22. different clue says:

    I’d like to see her “cap” every “knee” she can reach.

  23. ambrit says:

    A fully human situation. The best analogue I can think of in that case would be Traditional Christianity and Swedenborgian Christianity. Even there, I’m making the mistake of imposing western biases onto a foreign system.
    I’ve got a lot to learn.

  24. turcopolier says:

    Among the worthwhile things I learned is that in Islam the religion resists adopting forms and ways of thought common in the West. Attempts to graft Western religious thinking on Islam have been generally defeated over and over again. In the Arabic language I struggled for a long time to find mirrors in classical Arabic for western grammar. The language is taught to Westerners on that basis. In the end I came to realize that the things we labelled as “case,” “verbs,” “tense,” “adjectives,” etc. were nothing like their Western equivalents.

  25. ambrit says:

    My experiences with Spanish support your observation. I rarely have the good fortune to suddenly start to ‘think’ in the language. When I do, it is almost like being a different person.
    A question for you. Do the Persians read the Qur’an in arabic or farsi? I would imagine that would affect the interpretation of the verses. It’s bad enough for Christians to not read the Bible in the original Greek or Aramaic. My wife prefers the Latin Mass. It was how she originally learned it as a child. The emotional content of religion cannot be underestimated. That’s why I commented to Mr Makkinejad that I could understand matters in the Middle East a bit better with learning of the Pseudo-Calvinist sensibility of the Wahhabi.
    This old dog is trying to learn some new ‘tricks.’ Thank you all for the help.

  26. turcopolier says:

    With the exception of the Ibadhis all Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the UNCREATED word of God. it is an aspect of the mind of God, existing from all time and which descended to mankind through revelation to the Prophet. There are those who attempt to translate the Qur’an. The Ahmadis do that among others but it is thought to be an impious act. In a religious madrasa (school) the students learn the Qur’an by heart chanting it together with a teacher making sure they understand the verses. This may be the only Arabic they ever learn other than the muezzin’s call to prayer and such things. The eternity of the Qur’an is the reason the Arabic language never changes much. How could it? This attitude to the language as the expression of God’s thought has a profound effect on Muslim (especially Sunni) difficulty with free wheeling change of any kind. In Muslim societies there is a deep division between the old ways and people who are acculturated toward the West. But, in my experience, in every Muslim mind there is a constantly shifting partition between the old and the new. This is a partition that moves back and forth between the two worlds and on any given day the partition may have moved quite a lot. An outsider dealing intimately with them must sense each day where the partition is that day, or else.

  27. ambrit says:

    Thank you for that. It gives the idea of having old fashioned ‘Orientalists” in government the sense of being an imperative. I remember reading about how Lawrence was trained up to his fate in university. The French had a similar system I believe. Then there was Gertrude Bell.
    Do you have proteges in the service? For our countries sake I hope so.

  28. Babak Makkinejad says:

    There are multiple separate translations of the Quran into Persian available in Iran, a couple of them in poetic form. Generally people read the Arabic as well as the fine print Persian text underneath the Arabic text. Arabic’s fluidity of meaning escapes most people.

  29. Babak Makkinejad says:

    Yes, the War between Godless Modernity and Divine Afterlife; with little or no theological or philosophical understandings to try to mediate between them.

Comments are closed.