The true criminal history of White/McGreevy calls into question his claim to have served in the U.S. military or secured an ordination in an unidentified Christian community. The first record of Jon McGreevy’s criminal past in Maryland is June of 1992. He was 24 years old at the time. The charge? Theft. Jon McGreevy pled guilty to a felony.
CaseSearch District Court of Maryland
Case Information
Court System: District Court For Harford County – Criminal
Location: Harford
Case Number: 00618843R1
Title: The State of Maryland vs MCGREEVY, JONATHAN AMBROSE
Case Type: Criminal
Filing Date: 06/10/1992
Case Status: Closed
Tracking Number(s): 0000618843R1Charge No: 1 CJIS Code: 3-2400 Statute Code: 27.342
Charge Description: THEFT:$300 PLUS VALUE Charge Class: Felony District Court
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 06/10/1992 To:
Agency Name: MSP-BARRACK D (BEL AIR) Officer ID: 0930
Disposition
Plea: Guilty Plea Date: 09/03/1992
Disposition: Probation Before Judgment – Unsupervised Disposition Date: 09/03/1992
McGreevy could not keep his nose clean. He is arrested on 18 January 1999 for misdemeanor theft. He pled not guilty and the case went to trial. He lost and filed a motion for a new trial in July 1999.
CaseSearch District Court of Maryland
Case Information
Court System: District Court For Anne Arundel County – Criminal
Location: Annapolis
Case Number: 6A00068011
Title: The State of Maryland vs MCGREEVY, JONATHAN AMBROSE
Case Type: Criminal – SOC – Application
Filing Date: 01/18/1999
Case Status: Closed
Tracking Number(s): 960010032310Charge No: 1 CJIS Code: 3-2399 Statute Code: 27.342
Charge Description: THEFT:LESS $300 VALUE Charge Class: Misdemeanor
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 01/18/1999 To:
Agency Name: Officer ID:
Disposition
Plea: Not Guilty Plea Date: 10/20/1999
Disposition: Probation Before Judgment – Unsupervised Disposition Date: 10/20/1999
His legal problems escalated significantly in 2009. He was arrested on 22 October 2009 for Possession with Intent to Distribute Oxycodone and subsequently was charged with 4 felonies and 5 misdemeanors. Here is the list of charges:
Officer – Arresting/Complainant Name: MCCOMAS, A
AgencyName: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT
Address: 39 N. HICKORY AVE
City: BEL AIR State: MD Zip Code: 21014
Charge and Disposition Information
Charge No: 1 CJIS Code: 1-0233 Statute Code: CR.5.602
Charge Description: CDS POSS W/INT TO DIST Charge Class: Felony Circuit Court
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
Charge No: 2 CJIS Code: 4-3550 Statute Code: CR.5.601.(a)(1)
Charge Description: CDS:POSSESS-NOT MARIHUANA Charge Class: Misdemeanor
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
Charge No: 3 CJIS Code: 1-0487 Statute Code: CR.5.621.(b)(2)
Charge Description: CDS: DISTR ETC. W/FIREARM Charge Class: Felony Circuit Court
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
Charge No: 4 CJIS Code: 1-0493 Statute Code: CR.5.621.(b)(1)
Charge Description: FIREARM/DRUG TRAF CRIME Charge Class: Felony Circuit Court
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
Charge No: 5 CJIS Code: 1-0573 Statute Code: CR.5.601.(a)(1)
Charge Description: CDS: POSSESSION-MARIHUANA Charge Class: Misdemeanor
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
Charge No: 6 CJIS Code: 1-0233 Statute Code: CR.5.602
Charge Description: CDS POSS W/INT TO DIST Charge Class: Felony Circuit Court
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
Charge No: 7 CJIS Code: 5-3550 Statute Code: CR.5.619.(c)(1)
Charge Description: CDS:POSS PARAPHERNALIA Charge Class: Misdemeanor
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
Charge No: 8 CJIS Code: 2-5212 Statute Code: PS.5.203.(a)
Charge Description: RIFLE/SHOTGUN:UNREGISTERED Charge Class: Misdemeanor
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
Charge No: 9 CJIS Code: 1-5212 Statute Code: CR.4.203
Charge Description: HANDGUN ON PERSON Charge Class: Misdemeanor
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 10/22/2009 To:
Agency Name: BEL AIR POLICE DEPT Officer ID: 0111
During the April 2016 court hearing where Ryan Dark White pled guilty on two counts stemming from his October 2015 arrest, White acknowledged his 2009 arrest and subsequent conviction in 2010:
MR. MARTINEZ: He has a 2010 conviction for possession with intent to distribute Oxycodone that was entered in state court. And I believe that may, depending on the time he served for that conviction, may bump him into Category II. . .
THE COURT: All right. So offense level 18, Criminal History Category II, the advisory guidelines range is 30 to 37 months of incarceration. Are you familiar with that, Mr. White?
THE DEFENDANT: Yes.
You can find the details on the 2009-2010 prosecution and conviction of White at the Maryland State Court Records. Here is the case information:
Case Search Circuit Court of Maryland
Case Information
Court System: Circuit Court For Harford County – Criminal
Location: Harford Circuit Court
Case Number: 12-K-09-002044
Title: State Of Maryland vs Ryan Dark White
Case Type: Criminal Indictment
Filing Date: 12/01/2009
Case Status: Closed / Inactive
Tracking Number(s): 020006067701
Jonathan McGreevy using the new name, Ryan Dark White, is popped again by Homeland Security and DEA in October 2015. White lied to a Doctor, claiming he suffered from Lou Gehrig’s Disease, and was prescribed 1500 Oxycodone pills a month, with Medicare footing the bill. In addition, White had acquired firearms and ammunition in clear violation of his 2009 felony convictions and terms of parole. Here is the portion of the transcript from the 22 April 2016 hearing when Ryan Dark White entered and confirmed his plea deal:
THE COURT: You’ve indicated that you intend to plead guilty to Count 2 of the indictment in the 15-545 case and to the one count information in the 16-0172 case; right?
THE DEFENDANT: Yes.
THE COURT: I want to review with you now then the essential elements of these two charges. These are the things that the government would have to prove in order for you to be convicted in the case. First, in the 15-545 matter. First, the government would have to prove that the misconduct occurred on or about October 25, 2015. Second, they’d have to prove it happened at least in part in the District of Maryland. Third, they’d have to prove that you knowingly possessed ammunition as that term is defined in federal law. Fourth, they’d have to prove that prior to the date on which this allegedly occurred, that you had been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment, for a term exceeding one year, and that your civil rights had not been restored.
Fifth, they’d have to prove that the ammunition involved here affected interstate commerce. Specifically, in this case, because it was manufactured outside the state of Maryland. In the second case, which is numbered 16-0172, thegovernment would have to prove this misconduct occurred between September of 2011 and September of 2015. Second, they’d have to prove that it occurred at least in part in the District of Maryland. Third, they’d have to prove that you knowingly executed a scheme to defraud a health care benefit program by means of false fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises. Fourth, they’d have to prove that the false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises related to a material fact. Fifth they’d have to prove that you acted willfully and that you intended to defraud. And sixth, they’d have to prove that you did all of this in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services.
Do you understand that these are the essential elements of the two offenses, and if the government could not prove each and every one of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, to the unanimous satisfaction of the jury, then you could not be convicted on the count with respect to which they had failed to prove one of the elements?
THE DEFENDANT: Yes. . . .
THE COURT: Mr. Martinez, you may proffer what you believe is the factual basis for the guilty plea.
MR. MARTINEZ: Yes, Your Honor. If this matter proceeded to trial the government would prove that on the 5th of October, 2015, DEA agents executed a search warrant at Mr. White’s residence in Rosedale, Maryland. While searching the residence the agents recovered 420 rounds of .45 Colt
ammunition as well as four rounds of .410 gauge rifled slug hollow point ammunition. Mr. White admits today, Your Honor, that prior to October 5th of 2015, he had been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year and his civil rights had not been restored. He further admits that the ammunition recovered from his home was ammunition as defined under federal law and it affected interstate commerce.Mr. White further admits, and this relates to the 16-0172 matter, that between in or about September 2011 and in or about September 2015, he knowingly and unlawful obtained prescriptions for oxycodone and hydrocodone from Dr. Paul Frank Ginnandrea of Lutherville, Maryland. Mr. White obtained the prescriptions by willfully misrepresenting his medical condition, including specifically his ability to walk without the assistance of canes, which he claimed was a symptom of ALS, for the sole purpose of inducing Dr. Ginnandrea to issue prescriptions for which Mr. White had no legitimate medical need. If this matter proceeded to trial, Dr. Ginnandrea would have testified that but for the defendant’s false representations regarding his medical condition, Dr. Ginnandrea would not have issued prescriptions to Mr. White for Schedule II narcotics, such as hydrocodone and oxycodone. Medicare records indicate that between September 2011 to February 2014, Dr. Ginnandrea typically prescribed Mr. White 1,800 oxycodone 30 milligram pills a month, for a total of 59,310 dosage units. Similarly, from August of 2014 through December of 2015, Dr. Ginnandrea typically prescribed Mr. White 1,500 Zohydro 50 milligram pills per month, for a total of 20,850 dosage units. The active ingredient in Zohydro is hydrocodone. Medicare records indicate that it paid $142,911 for prescriptions issued by Dr. Ginnandrea to Mr. White between September 2011 and September 2015. As the Court knows, Medicare is a federally funded health care benefit program, it provides services to the elderly and
disabled. . . .THE COURT: But now you have satisfied me that you do know you’re doing, that you do understand your rights, that these two guilty pleas are what you really want to do. So I’m ready to circle back in a second and ask you again how you plead to these two charges, but this time when I ask you and get your answer, it’s for keeps. It’s irrevocable. Are you with me?
THE DEFENDANT: I’m with you, sir.
THE COURT: Okay. Then in case No. JKB-16-0172, as to Count 2 of the indictment that has — well, let’s start over. As to case number JKB-15-545, as to Count 2 of the indictment that has been returned against you, how do you plead, guilty or not guilty?
THE DEFENDANT: Guilty, Your Honor.
THE COURT: And as to case number JKB-16-0172, as to the one count information, how do you plead, guilty or not guilty?
THE DEFENDANT: Guilty, Your Honor.
THE COURT: It’s the finding of the Court in these two cases of the United States versus Ryan Dark White, the first JKB-15-545 and the second JKB-16-0172, that the defendant is fully competent and capable of entering informed pleas, that the defendant is aware of the nature of the charges and the consequences of the guilty pleas, that the guilty pleas are knowing and voluntary pleas supported by independent bases in fact, containing each of the essential elements of the two offenses. The pleas are, therefore, accepted and the defendant is now adjudged guilty of these two offenses.
Ryan Dark White has had one more run-in with the police since his 2016 guilty pleas. The most recent incident occurred in April 2019. White was arrested on two misdemeanor charges for lying to the police:
Case Search District Court of Maryland
Case Information
Court System: District Court For Harford County – Criminal
Location: Harford
Case Number: D-09-CR-19-001565
Title: State of Maryland vs. RYAN DARK WHITE
Case Type: Criminal – SOC – Application
Filing Date: 05/08/2019
Case Status: Closed
Tracking Number(s): 181001773540Charge No: 1 CJIS Code: 1-4803 Statute Code: CR.9.501
Charge Description: FALSE STATEMENT TO OFFICER Charge Class: Misdemeanor
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 04/04/2019 To: 04/04/2019
Agency Name: Officer ID:
Disposition
Plea: Other Plea Plea Date: 09/04/2019
Disposition: Stet Disposition Date: 09/04/2019Charge No: 2 CJIS Code: 1-0207 Statute Code: CR.9.501
Charge Description: FLSE STMNT TO OFFICER CAUSE Charge Class: Misdemeanor
Probable Cause: YES
Offense Date From: 04/04/2019 To: 04/04/2019
Agency Name: Officer ID:
Disposition
Plea: Other Plea Plea Date: 09/04/2019
Disposition: Stet Disposition Date: 09/04/2019
The preceding references show that Jonathan McGreevy aka Ryan Dark White is not the man he claimed to be in his recorded testimony to Lin Wood and in his interview with Stew Peters. It is this simple–McGreevy/White is a multiple felon.
If you take the time to read the full court record surrounding White’s 2015 arrest, you will see that there are sealed documents. There is no record of his guilty pleas being reversed. Sealed records like these normally indicate that the prisoner has become a cooperating informant. What we now need to know is whether or not Ryan Dark White approached Lin Wood at the behest of the Department of Justice.
So tell me how George Floyd became St George Floyd with an even worse criminal record, but was lucky enough to over-dose while in police custody?
Strange world. Along with breaking news the AZ audit breaking up as a farce after all. Fake news? No one knows any longer, and that is not fake news. These shall be the times to try many men’s souls (generically speaking), but we will emerge all the better for it. And Biden is still President. Which begs the question, who indeed were the real winners and losers in 2020?
As DC continues to pursue frivolity and investigate itself to death without prosecuting anyone but tourists and people they abetted into illegal actions, the rest of us are watching. Without actually marching on DC and doing what they all are salivating for – insurrection – nothing will change. The Swamp is far deeper than most realize, in bed with oligarchs and criminals to our disadvantage.
I don’t know what you men by thinking we emerge “better” for it. I am thinking that we will emerge different than we are today – living in a land of liars and thieves will do that to people.
Lin Wood is an ex-con, and many people have bounced back from that. I tend to believe that sealed documents = nefarious skulduggery with government bad guys. So the assumption made here has a reasonable shot at being truth. But in this land we currently live in, there is no knowing truth when there is no investigation into facts – only narrative support for the desired thoughts.
Broadcast and social media are purveyors of narratives, obfuscating and shying from facts at every turn. Until those edifices tumble down, there will be zero fallout for liars, thieves, conmen and crooks – in other words, government officials.
they will nail the seth rich killers.just a matter of time.
“THEY” ? If by ‘they’ you mean the DOJ or the FBI, then you are delusional. Both of these groups are rotten to the core. If you go do some due diligence around the Ruby Ridge fiasco, you will quickly learn that both FBI and DOJ are incompetent and corrupt.
Time is what they count on and appropriate in order for them to continue to garner salaries, pensions and bonuses while doing as little work as possible. This is known as “federal grifting”. along with stock tips and book deals for the bigger fish. Your hopium is not going to change their SOP.
here Larry.go have some fun
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543369/gov.uscourts.nysd.543369.2.0.pdf
That might explain why the name Tutor-Saliba is plastered on every single highway construction temporary traffic barrier in the entire city of Los Angeles. They must have found a way to be on the inside track for all highway construction projects. How does the exact same company manage to win so many low-bid public works projects?
If you take the time to read the full court record surrounding White’s 2015 arrest, you will see that there are sealed documents. There is no record of his guilty pleas being reversed. Sealed records like these normally indicate that the prisoner has become a cooperating informant. What we now need to know is whether or not Ryan Dark White approached Lin Wood at the behest of the Department of Justice.
That is a very useful piece of analysis that will be of great interest to many researchers. Thank you for providing that piece of the puzzle.
longarch,
I agree the point about sealed records is of very great interest indeed.
More generally, there is I think reason to suspect that a very significant number of people who have been appearing to be collaborating in attempts to expose ‘Russiagate’ have, to greater or lesser degrees, been playing ‘double games.’
Confronted by energetic and able people who have uncovered information which threatens to take the exposure of the ‘Plot Against the President’ beyond the ‘limited hangouts’ which had quite clearly become inescapable, and are threatening to unearth much more, a rather obvious strategy is to feed them a mixture of accurate and inaccurate information. The inaccurate can then be used to discredit the accurate.
Having been busy trying to ‘tie up’ a lot of ‘unfinished business’ at the British end, I have not been able to follow developments in the lawsuits provoked by the claims about Dominion and Smartmatic. But for a considerable time I have suspected that precisely such a strategy may have been used to ‘defuse’ the challenge posed by the – formidable – forensic skills of Ms. Sidney Powell.
This may be something of a ‘heads I win, tails you lose’ strategy. Even if the lawsuits do not succeed in ‘crushing’ her, and others, they may simply mean that they are, as it were, ‘out of commission’ in relation to pursuing other lines of investigation.
And then, part of the purpose of the exercise may have been to allow issues to do with the use of voting machines to distract attention from good, old-fashioned ‘ballot stuffing’, which may actually have been far more significant.