“New notes will show FBI lied to Congress about Steele dossier” Washington Examiner

24

"A top Republican defended his committee releasing the declassified FBI interview with a top source for British ex-spy Christopher Steele and said a forthcoming document would show the bureau misled Congress about the reliability of his anti-Trump dossier.

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, criticized the former MI6 agent, said Steele’s dossier was compromised by Russian disinformation, and argued newly public FBI notes from a January 2017 discussion with Steele’s "primary subsource" demonstrated the FBI knew the dossier was unreliable but continued to use it anyway. During his interview with Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures on Fox News, he also previewed new bureau records to be released in the upcoming week he said would show the FBI misled not just the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court about the Steele dossier, but also lawmakers.

“We also now have found, and this will come out next week, that Congress got suspicious about the Russian subsource and reliability of the Steele Dossier, and that members of Congress asked to be briefed about it,” Graham said. “Here is what I think I’m going to be able to show to the public: not only did the FBI lie to the court about the reliability about the Steele dossier, they also lied to the Congress. And that is a separate crime.”"  Washington Examiner

————-

The first thing to do is fire Christopher Wray, the present Director of the FBI, for malfeasance and neglect of duty in this whole matter.

The second thing to do is to seriously consider dissolution of the FBI and its replacement with a new federal police force severely limited to criminal investigations of violations of federal law.

There should also be a separate domestic internal security investigative body modeled on the UK's MI-5 (the Security Service).  Whether or not such a service should have the power of arrest is an open question.  If arrests become necessary after their investigations the agents of some other federal police force could be used to make them after examination of the security service's case.

The rest of the USIC should be examined with an eye to re-organization in light of the partisan role they played in the 2016 election.

pl

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lindsey-graham-new-notes-will-show-fbi-lied-to-congress-about-steele-dossier

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_A._Wray

This entry was posted in government, Intelligence, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to “New notes will show FBI lied to Congress about Steele dossier” Washington Examiner

  1. blue peacock says:

    Col. Lang
    How can any of the law enforcement and IC be re-organized when everyone in DC from the politicians in both parties to the media and the top honchos in government are all part of the same social and professional circle? They just keep rotating around.
    Elliott Abrams epitomizes this. He’s a convicted felon in the Iran-Contra affair in the Reagan administration. Get’s pardoned by Bush pere. Pushed hard for the disastrous Iraq invasion in the George W. Bush administration. Then in charge of the Venezuela coup attempt in the Trump administration. Fails at that. And then now gets appointed to head the Iran desk to create more trouble.
    DC is incestuous and corrupt beyond redemption.
    As far is Wray is concerned why hasn’t he been fired sometime back? Why did Trump hire him and Rosenstein in the first place?

  2. Jack says:

    @LindseyGrahamSC saying today the 2018 SSCI had doubts about Steele’s primary sub source, and pointing fingers at the 2018 FBI for misinformation, carries an identical motive to Sally Yates testimony last week.
    It’s all CYA in DC Central. Graham protecting SSCI.

    https://twitter.com/thelastrefuge2/status/1292483937508429825?s=21
    It appears the Republicans in the Senate were in on the Russia Collusion hoax and now throwing the FBI under the bus. DC is a cesspool of corruption. Only voters can reform this club by voting both parties out.

  3. Jack says:

    Writing on Substack, Steven Schrage for the first time tells the story of how he worked alongside “FBI Informant” Stefan Halper at Cambridge during the “Russiagate” period:

    https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1292470973569146882?s=21
    We are nearly at the end of Trump’s term yet his administration hasn’t provided a full accounting of the election interference and framing of Trump and some of his team by the previous Obama administration and his own administration.

  4. Jim says:

    Sen. Graham thinks [or at least says] Russia hacked the Democrats; and thinks [or at least says] Igor Dancheko represent “Russian disinformation.”
    “The sub-source [Danchenko] was a senior Russian researcher at the Brookings Institution and an employee of Christopher Steele living in the United States. He calls up a bunch of people in Russia. Who do you think this information came from? It came from the Russian intelligence service. They played this guy like a fiddle,” Graham has recently said.
    Unctuous Graham himself continues maliciously to spread lies.
    The first words out of his mouth at last week’s hearing with the unctuous Sally Yates was Russia hacked the Democrats.
    In other words, he was pretending — and in his thus lying, creating a “predicate” for all of the Russia Hoax nonsense that continues and which he helps to continue, by lying.
    So is this liar going to get to the bottom of it, or instead create and continue to create alternate reality from which more propaganda be disseminated and spun onto American public?
    He, and those pushing these lies, our congressional leaders — and think we are not aware of their vile and moral turpitude.
    Not only did the FBI and Sally Yates and Rosenstein lie to the court about the reliability about the Steele dossier.
    And not only does Graham continue to lie to the American people.
    Who is assisting Graham to run his ongoing and continuing cover up?
    The FBI? The DOJ? The CIA? Senator Warner? etc. . . .
    Why does the Senate list Mark Warner, a Democrat, as “Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee”?
    https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/
    Of 24 US Senate committees, 3 list a Democrat as vice chair; the rest list a ranking member. Why is this?
    https://www.senate.gov/committees/
    When the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was formed in 1976, via Senate Resolution 400 of the 94th Congress, this is what they decided:
    [[[(b) At the beginning of each Congress, the Majority Leader of the Senate shall select a chairman of the select Committee and the Minority Leader shall select a vice chairman for the select Committee. The vice chairman shall act in the place and stead of the chairman in the absence of the chairman. Neither the chairman nor the vice chairman of the select committee shall at the same time serve as chairman or ranking minority member of any other committee]]]
    https://www.senate.gov/general/resources/pdf/authority_and_rules_of_senate_committees.pdf
    PS
    Fire Wray, dissolve FBI, excellent suggestions.
    In its place, a new federal police force severely limited to criminal investigations of violations of federal law, also a step in the right direction.
    Should the nation’s federal police chief report to the AG directly, or directly to the president?
    Should this job be subject to advise and consent of senate, or, as is case with National Security Advisor, not subject to advise and consent of senate?
    And feel free to criticize, but someone like . . . Attorney Michael Bernard Mukasey, former federal judge and 81st Attorney General of the United States — he, be named acting FBI, right now, forthwith?
    -30-

  5. Jack says:

    Sir
    It appears that SSCI with Burr and Warner are in on the coup attempt. They likely had Wolfe leak the Carter Page FISA application which was marked by a FBI special agent to his squeeze who took it with her to the NY Times. Mueller then takes over that investigation and buries it including lying to FISC. Wolfe gets away with a slap on the wrist. They are all implicated in the coup attempt – Republicans & Democrats in Congress, the FBI, DOJ, DNI, CIA, Obama, Biden, the media!
    In a functioning constitutional republic this would be considered outrageous no matter one’s opinion of Trump. The fact that the Trump administration itself is playing a huge role in obfuscating this subversion of the constitution by those entrusted to protect and defend it is telling. I’m old and my creator beckons. It pains me to no end what legacy we are leaving behind to our grandchildren and their children. My grandpa would be so dismayed!
    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/08/08/the-truth-doesnt-care-about-your-feelings-the-big-ugly/

  6. turcopolier says:

    jim
    I would certainly support Mukasy’s nomination.

  7. Fred says:

    The leaders and/or senior staff, of the SSCI new all along. Why did the SSCI leadership (Senators Burr, Warner and Feinstein) ask the judge to go easy on SSCI Security Director James Wolfe when he was sentenced for lying to the FBI?
    https://fas.org/irp/congress/2018_cr/ssci-wolfe.pdf
    https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/former-us-senate-employee-sentenced-prison-term-false-statements-charge
    Who compromised this trio of senior senate leadership? Feinstein had a Chinese spy on her staff for a decade, apparently oblivious to that the whole time. Of course Russia is all we hear about, then and now.

  8. ex PFC Chuck says:

    Jack,
    Just to clarify, the link you posted above is about Steven Schrage, not by him. It was written by Matt Taibbi at his personal internet perch. I agree it’s definitely worth the time to read.

  9. Rick Merlotti says:

    Jack
    I was about to link the Tiabbi material when I saw your post. This is a must read. It ties up some loose threads on russiagate/obamagate.

  10. walrus says:

    Col. Lang,
    The FBI is indeed fighting for its survival, as I suspect are elements of the DOJ and other elements of the I C . If Trump is re elected, he will have a mandate for reform, that is why they will stop at nothing to prevent it.
    I think, as someone else here at SST has suggested, the swamp is going to use the 20th Amendment to install Pelosi or similar. The chosen vehicle will be corruption of a mail in ballot process. As my first boss told me as we watche ounance manager being marched away by the police: “when someone is going to steal from you, the first thing they do is mess up the paperwork”. That maxim proved true a number of times in my career.

  11. sbin says:

    DC District of Corruption is beyond redemption.
    The 17 “intelligence” agencies are rotten to the core as well.
    I love my country but have a growing dislike of my federal government.
    More like feral government.
    Doubt the newly found corona super powers are going away anytime soon.
    Grandparents were Irish immigrants.Learned early to keep a well stocked cellar and as much savings as possible.
    Hard times are coming.

  12. blue peacock says:

    Jack
    It seems that Steven Schrage coming forward NOW with a recording of Halper stating that Flynn’s gonna be f*ked 2 days before the leak to David Ignatius is a new shiny object to distract. Similar to Ms. Lindsey’s faux outrage NOW that the FBI lied to SSCI. Of course he knew and so did Burr & Warner back in 2018. They kept quiet all this time. The big question is what did Senators Burr & Warner know and when and what role did they play in the coverup? And of course the same goes for Ms. Lindsey and the rest of the coterie in Congress?
    Col. Lang,
    What do your expert senses detect when both Rosenstein & Sally Yates have the best Captain Renault impersonation? They knew nuttin!! They just sign FISA applications and keep seats warm.

  13. TV says:

    For years,the Feebs have been flat-footed keystone cops in the counterintelligence area.
    Want more evidence?
    Peter Strzok – a mediocrity with no sense of op security rose to number 2 in the FBI CI division.
    Look at the bumbling mess these dolts made out of their attempted “coup.”
    Spy catching is not police work;it’s “intelligence” work.

  14. Oilman2 says:

    “The rest of the USIC should be examined with an eye to re-organization in light of the partisan role they played in the 2016 election.”
    Isn’t this exactly what Gen. Flynn was about to do? Audit the IC?

  15. turcopolier says:

    blue peacock
    These are partisan scum in spite of Ms Yates beautiful manners and voicings.

  16. JerseyJeffersonian says:

    Col. Lang,
    I think that what other posters may be seeing and commenting upon is trenchently conveyed in this quote from Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope:
    “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.”
    This understanding adequately accounts for the behavior of The Borg toward President Trump’s stated aims, and the defenestration of General Flynn. They don’t want anything to change, and will go to any lengths to prevent it from happening. I guess we’ll have to see if this will, indeed, be how it plays out. In my heart of hearts I certainly hope not.

  17. blue peacock says:

    Fred
    Wolfe was only indicted for lying to the FBI. He was never indicted for the big stuff of leaking the classified Carter Page FISA application provided by the FBI to SSCI to his “mistress” Ali Watkins. She moved to the NY Times and then began writing exposes that sold a certain now proven false narrative.
    Was Wolfe ordered to leak it by Burr & Warner? Why was the leak investigation taken over by Mueller? What role did SSCI have in the coverup? What was Warner doing as some of his text messages to Steele’s attorney Adam Waldman was released by Mueller?
    Was SSCI a co-conspirator in the framing of a duly elected President?

  18. Dan says:

    “Just to clarify, the link you posted above is about Steven Schrage, not by him”
    Hi Ex-PFC Chuck – the piece was definitely written by Schrage. Its a first-person account of his work under Halper, with a ton of observations about his character and past.
    For what its worth I sensed a little bit of CYA in the piece, like Schrage is trying to cleave himself from the rest of the group. His account of how and why Carter Page got to his symposium doesn’t really add up – did he make a similar effort to get a member of the Clinton campaign? Appears not.

  19. Fred says:

    Blue Peacock,
    “Was SSCI a co-conspirator in the framing of a duly elected President?”
    Good questions. I would go back a couple decades and see how much money in donations those members got from people who could have corrupted them, such as Jeffery Epstein and those connected to him, and see if they have any other foreign financial entanglements.

Comments are closed.